Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-year-1-of-the-computer-science-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2013/digital-systems-linear-algebra-introduction-to-formal-proof/7/d/i/solution
Past exam of the year 1 of the computer science course of the University of Oxford 2013 Digital systems, linear algebra, introduction to formal proof 7 d i Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Under the premise, assuming either disjunct would introduce the forbidden logical disjunction. Discharging those two assumptions gives the two separate negations, which can then be conjoined.
Table 1.
Derivation of the two negated disjuncts
. | Line | Open assumptions | Formula | Justification |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Premise | |
| 2 | 1, 2 | Temporary assumption | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | disjunction introduction L 2 | |
| 4 | 1, 2 | negation elimination rule 3, 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | negation introduction 2, 4 | |
| 6 | 1, 6 | Temporary assumption | |
| 7 | 1, 6 | disjunction introduction R 6 | |
| 8 | 1, 6 | negation elimination rule 7, 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | negation introduction 6, 8 | |
| 10 | 1 | conjunction introduction 5, 9 |
ThusThe redundant closing parenthesis printed after the conclusion on p. 8 does not alter the readable propositional formula.[ref]
New to topics? Read the docs here!