Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-year-1-of-the-computer-science-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2017/discrete-mathematics-continuous-mathematics-and-probability/1/b/i/solution

For the first set inclusion, take . Then but . Since membership in is already known, failure to lie in that relative complement forces . Hence .
Conversely, if , then and its membership in excludes it from . Therefore . The two inclusions prove the stated equality with the set intersection.

New to topics? Read the docs here!