Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-year-1-of-the-computer-science-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2018/digital-systems-linear-algebra-introduction-to-formal-proof/7/a/solution

The reductio ad absurdum rule discharges an assumption from a derivation of contradiction and concludes . It is derivable using negation introduction followed by double-negation elimination:
Conversely, if RAA is supplied, double-negation elimination follows from this natural deduction derivation:
1. ¬¬φ                  premise
2.   ¬φ                 assumption [i]
3.   ⊥                  ¬E, 1, 2
4. φ                    RAA, 2–3, discharging [i]
Thus replacing double-negation elimination by RAA leaves these classical deductions available. RAA is not being assumed as an intuitionistic rule.

New to topics? Read the docs here!