Pulse-contrast ratio denominator noise
ID: pulse-contrast-ratio-denominator-noise
Pulse-contrast ratio denominator noise is the distortion introduced when a noisy central pulse signal is used to normalize a side-delay signal. A shot-resolved pulse-contrast estimator uses after background correction, so errors in affect both precision and the distribution of the ratio.
For central values with , a second-order local expansion givesThis approximation requires sufficiently small fluctuations and well-behaved ratio moments. It shows why an unbiased central-signal measurement need not give an unbiased normalized ratio. First-order uncertainty propagation alone describes local spread, not this mean shift; the GUM warns that nonlinear models can require higher-order terms.[ref]
Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement by JCGM. §5.1.2, nonlinear functions; §5.2, correlated inputs
An original bounded example takes constant side signal and equally likely central readings or 11. The mean central reading is 10, so the ratio of means is 0.01. ButThe second-order prediction is 0.0101 because . Increasing the number of such shots estimates the shifted mean more precisely; it does not remove the nonlinear effect.
Correlation can instead make normalization exact. If for every accepted shot with nonzero , their ratio is always , however variable the common multiplier. This is a different error structure from adding independent noise to the two channels. A shared additive background is also not generally equivalent to a shared multiplicative gain.
Near zero, even existence of a mean can fail. If is fixed and is uniform on , every ratio is positive butThis mathematical example explains why “the denominator was never exactly zero” is insufficient. Detector noise is not asserted to follow this distribution.
A pulse-contrast denominator acceptance rule such as changes the sampled population. Report the rule, rejected-shot count and dependence between brightness and pulse shape. The primary single-shot correlator's nonlinear gate and CCD readout motivate acquiring the relevant signals together, but do not guarantee that all ratios are statistically well conditioned.[ref]
A Single Shot 3rd Order Cross-Correlator for Pulse Contrast and Pulse Shape Measurements by J. Collier and others. printed pp. 194–195, Description and Fig. 2
Resolve the denominator and background experimentally before interpreting a long average of ratios. New to topics? Read the docs here!