Pulse-contrast ratio denominator noise

ID: pulse-contrast-ratio-denominator-noise

Pulse-contrast ratio denominator noise is the distortion introduced when a noisy central pulse signal is used to normalize a side-delay signal. A shot-resolved pulse-contrast estimator uses after background correction, so errors in affect both precision and the distribution of the ratio.
For central values with , a second-order local expansion gives
This approximation requires sufficiently small fluctuations and well-behaved ratio moments. It shows why an unbiased central-signal measurement need not give an unbiased normalized ratio. First-order uncertainty propagation alone describes local spread, not this mean shift; the GUM warns that nonlinear models can require higher-order terms.[ref]
An original bounded example takes constant side signal and equally likely central readings or 11. The mean central reading is 10, so the ratio of means is 0.01. But
The second-order prediction is 0.0101 because . Increasing the number of such shots estimates the shifted mean more precisely; it does not remove the nonlinear effect.
Correlation can instead make normalization exact. If for every accepted shot with nonzero , their ratio is always , however variable the common multiplier. This is a different error structure from adding independent noise to the two channels. A shared additive background is also not generally equivalent to a shared multiplicative gain.
Near zero, even existence of a mean can fail. If is fixed and is uniform on , every ratio is positive but
This mathematical example explains why “the denominator was never exactly zero” is insufficient. Detector noise is not asserted to follow this distribution.
A pulse-contrast denominator acceptance rule such as changes the sampled population. Report the rule, rejected-shot count and dependence between brightness and pulse shape. The primary single-shot correlator's nonlinear gate and CCD readout motivate acquiring the relevant signals together, but do not guarantee that all ratios are statistically well conditioned.[ref] Resolve the denominator and background experimentally before interpreting a long average of ratios.

New to topics? Read the docs here!