Tit for tat invasion of a reactive resident
ID: tit-for-tat-invasion-of-a-reactive-resident
For a reactive resident with , let and . Its self-payoff and both ordered cross-payoffs against Tit for tat equal . At introduced Tit for tat frequency , its fitness difference is therefore the displayed expression. If , it is positive for because . Fully cooperative reached histories tie; the deterministic opposite-response strategy needs a separate cycle calculation. Initial advantage is order frequency rather than a positive invasion exponent at zero.
New to topics? Read the docs here!