The exact energies and mixing coefficients contain
As a function of complex , its nearest branch points to the origin occur when its argument vanishes:
Their distance from the expansion point determines the radius of convergence. Therefore
The real-axis perturbation series converges for .
The characteristic equation is
Hence the imaginary-coupled two-level Hamiltonian has exact energies
Choose a real angle satisfying
Normalized exact eigenstates are
Since
these states and energies reproduce exactly the linear-order perturbative results from part (i).
Let . Hermiticity gives
so in the ordered basis ,
For a nondegenerate unperturbed level, the first-order nondegenerate perturbation theory formulas are
The diagonal matrix elements vanish, so both linear energy corrections are zero. The state corrections are
Thus, through linear order,
Normalization changes only at quadratic order.
Put . The first-order system is
At an equilibrium point of a dynamical system, and , so the three fixed points are
Define
Then and
Moreover,
so is positive definite at the origin. It is therefore a damped mechanical energy as a Lyapunov function, and the First Lyapunov theorem proves that the origin is Lyapunov stable.
Since , choose a compact energy sublevel with . In this set, means . A trajectory can remain in only when , and the chosen sublevel excludes . Thus the largest invariant subset of is the origin. The LaSalle invariance principle proves that the origin is asymptotically stable.
Finally, is radially unbounded because its leading terms are . Every forward trajectory is therefore bounded. LaSalle's principle puts its omega-limit set inside
An omega-limit set of a bounded continuous trajectory is nonempty and connected. A connected subset of this three-point set is a singleton, so every trajectory has precisely one of the three fixed points as its omega-limit set.
For , a fixed point satisfies . It is Lyapunov stable when, for every , there is such that
A Lyapunov function on a neighbourhood of is a continuously differentiable function such that
The First Lyapunov theorem states that such a function makes Lyapunov stable. If away from , then is locally asymptotically stable.
To prove stability, choose a closed ball contained in the domain of . On its boundary sphere , compactness and positive definiteness give
Continuity at supplies such that implies . Along a trajectory, cannot increase. Such a trajectory therefore cannot first reach the boundary sphere, where its value would be at least . This proves Lyapunov stability.
If away from , take a sufficiently small compact sublevel set of . The LaSalle invariance principle says that every trajectory in it approaches the largest invariant subset of , which is just . Hence the equilibrium is also asymptotically stable.
No. Let and, for , define
while
Both families are asymptotic sequences, and for every .
Take . It has the exact expansion
Suppose it had an expansion . The order-zero condition forces . At order one we would then require some constant such that
After division by , the left side is , which cannot tend to zero. This contradiction proves that no such coefficients exist. Thus termwise equivalent asymptotic scales need not preserve expansions.
A function in the stated network class has the form
Thus this is the class from part (d), with the hidden-unit class
Parts (c) and (d) give
This is the growth bound for a single-hidden-layer sign network.
First fix an ordered tuple . On writing
the resulting classifiers are . The growth bound for homogeneous linear classifiers in dimension gives at most label vectors on any sample points.
If is finite, there are ordered tuples of hidden functions. The shattering coefficient of a union therefore gives
For an arbitrary , fix . Choose one representative for every distinct vector in , obtaining a finite class with
Every -tuple from agrees on the sample with an -tuple from . The finite-class argument now gives
Taking the supremum over proves the general growth bound for signs of m-term linear combinations:
For every fixed ,
The cardinality of a union is at most the sum of the two cardinalities, so
Taking the supremum over samples proves the shattering coefficient of a union bound
For fixed sample points , write
The shattering coefficient is
Thus it is the largest number of distinct binary labelings that the hypothesis class can realize on points.
A set of points is shattered when all labelings are realized. The VC dimension is therefore
with value infinity if arbitrarily large finite sets are shattered.
Choose with . By part (d),
Each is -measurable. Distinct summands are orthogonal: if , conditioning on makes every factor except known and . The cross terms with vanish in the same way, while . Expanding the square therefore gives
This is the stopped martingale isometry in a Rademacher filtration.
Let . Given , the new information at time is only the independent symmetric sign . Thus
for some -measurable . Taking conditional expectation and using the martingale property gives . More explicitly, one can take
which is predictable. Therefore
This is the predictable representation in a Rademacher filtration.
Write . Conditional on , the variables , , and are known, while . Hence
The denominator is positive almost surely, so the recovery of a martingale-transform integrand by conditional covariance gives
The increments of satisfy
Since , the indicator is predictable. Part (a), applied to this bounded integrand, shows that is a martingale. Equivalently, this is the stopped martingale theorem.
The process is adapted because is -measurable, is -measurable, and is -measurable. Using the predictability of and the martingale increment property,
The assumed integrability therefore proves that is the martingale transform of by and is a martingale.
Let
Its gradient, in the coordinate order , is
Apply the Delta method to the limit in part (c). Multiplying the displayed covariance matrix there on both sides by this gradient gives
Consequently the asymptotic distribution of the Gaussian sample correlation is
Set , , and . The estimator is the sample mean of the independent random vectors
The supplied fourth moments give
Therefore the multivariate central limit theorem gives
This is the asymptotic covariance of the bivariate Gaussian covariance estimator.

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.