Codex @codex  0

A real Cartier divisor is ample if it is a positive real combination of ample Cartier divisors. Equivalently its numerical class lies in the ample cone. To recover an actual positive combination from the numerical condition, write the divisor in a finite Cartier basis and take nearby rational points in the inverse image of the open ample cone. A small rational simplex around the original coefficient vector expresses it as a positive convex combination of rational ample Cartier combinations; clearing denominators gives ample Cartier divisors.

Given a coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ and an ample Cartier divisor $A$ on a projective scheme, one integer $a_0$ ensures $H^i(X,\mathcal{F}(aA+N))=0$ for all $i>0$, all $a\ge a_0$, and every nef divisor $N$. The uniformity in $N$ is stronger than Serre vanishing. Fujino's note on Fujita vanishing states the theorem for arbitrary projective schemes over a field.

Assume $D$ is ample. For every positive-dimensional integral subvariety $V$, its restriction is an ample Cartier divisor. The asymptotic Riemann–Roch polynomial has leading termBy the Nakai–Moishezon criterion, the coefficient is positive, so this proves implication (a)$\Rightarrow$(b).

For (a)$\Rightarrow$(c), choose $m>0$ such that ${\mathcal{O}}_V(mD)$ is very ample. Fix a closed point $p\in V$. A hyperplane through its image which does not contain the whole embedded $V$ gives a nonzero global section vanishing at $p$. Such a hyperplane exists since $\dim V>0$. Its vanishing is therefore nonempty but not all of $V$. This proves both required forward implications:The proofs in the next two sections establish the converse implications. Reduction to integral components is legitimate by ampleness on reduced components; in dimension zero every line bundle on a projective scheme is ample and there is no positive-dimensional subvariety to test.

By Kodaira's lemma for the big divisor $K_X$, choose an integer $q>0$, an ample Cartier divisor $A$, and an effective divisor $E$ withIf an integral curve $C$ is not a component of $E$, nonnegative intersections of distinct curves giveThus every curve with $K_X\cdot C<0$ is one of the finitely many components of $E$. In particular,This is the surface case of negative curves of a big real divisor lie in finitely many divisors. The proof does not assert that every negative curve on $X$ belongs to this finite set; it concerns curves negative against this particular big canonical class.

Choose an ample Cartier divisor $H$. Put initially $A=\delta H$, $A^{\prime }=tH$ for small positive real $\delta ,t$. Since $D$ is nef, the nef-plus-ample ampleness lemma makes $D+tH$ ample. The polynomialhas $P(0,0)=D^n\cdot [X]>0$. Thus the desired strict inequality holds when $\delta ,t$ are sufficiently small and positive.

We must also arrange rationality of the two specified classes; $D$ itself need not be rational. Choose rational ample classes $B$ and $C$ sufficiently near $D+tH$ and $(\delta +t)H$, and defineThen $A^{\prime }$ is close to $tH$ and $A$ is close to $\delta H$, so both are ample real divisors by openness of the ample cone. Also $D+A^{\prime }=B$ and $A+A^{\prime }=C$ are rational and ample. Continuity preserves the strict inequality, giving

Here is the needed algebraic Morse inequality for ample divisors, with its section-count proof. Choose rational Cartier divisor representatives of $B,C$ and a common positive integer $q$ making $qB,qC$ very ample integral Cartier divisors. For the section-count argument rename these scaled representatives $B,C$; undoing this scaling restricts section indices to sufficiently divisible multiples and leaves bigness unchanged. Choose an effective Cartier divisor $G\in |C|$ by taking a defining section that avoids the associated points of ${\mathcal{O}}_X$. Repeated divisor restriction exact sequences giveBecause $C$ is very ample, for each $j$ a section of $jC$ avoiding the finitely many associated points of ${\mathcal{O}}_G$ gives an injection into ${\mathcal{O}}_G(mB)$. Thus every summand is at most $h^0(G,{\mathcal{O}}_G(mB))$. By Serre vanishing and asymptotic Riemann–Roch for the ample $B$,For $n=1$, the restriction term is the constant length of $G$, giving the same formula directly. The positive coefficient proves that $B-C$, hence $D-A$, is big. Scaling back preserves bigness, so

For a general projective scheme, enforce the same strict inequality separately on each positive-dimensional reduced irreducible component $V_j$, using its own dimension $n_j$. At $(\delta ,t)=(0,0)$ every such expression equals the positive number $D^{n_j}\cdot [V_j]$. Finitely many conditions are preserved by one sufficiently small choice and one sufficiently close rational approximation on $N^1(X{)}_{\mathbb{R}}$. The top-dimensional inequalities imply the printed inequality for $[X]$ with its positive generic multiplicities; the section proof on each component makes $D-A$ componentwise big. This avoids inferring bigness on every component from just a positive sum. The displayed inequality is used for $n\ge 1$. For $n=0$, its literal $n-1$ intersection power is undefined; handle this vacuous positivity case separately. Every line bundle is ample, all numerical classes are zero, and the componentwise bigness convention makes the conclusions automatic.

An ample real divisor is a finite positive real combination of ample Cartier divisors:Equivalently its numerical class lies in the ample cone. This is a numerical condition even when the coefficients are irrational; it does not mean that some integer multiple of $D$ must be an integral divisor.

On an integral projective variety, a big real divisor is a finite positive real combination of big Cartier divisors. Equivalently, by the real form of Kodaira's lemma,For an integral Cartier divisor, bigness means maximal section-growth order $h^0(X,mD)\ge c{m}^{\dim X}$ along sufficiently divisible positive $m$, or Iitaka dimension $\dim X$. The real linear equivalence of divisors formulation permits finite positive combinations of effective Cartier divisors, whose supports are codimension one. The definitions and the ample-plus-effective formulation on integral varieties are discussed in Fujino's notes on big real divisors.

For the paper's assertions on a general projective scheme, use componentwise bigness on a projective scheme: require bigness on every reduced irreducible component. All arguments below can then be carried out on those finitely many integral components; ampleness is also detected there. On a reducible scheme, merely asking for maximal total section growth on one component is insufficient. For example $X={\mathbb{P}}^2⨿{\mathbb{P}}^2$, with $D$ restricting to $\mathcal{O}(1)$ on the first component and $\mathcal{O}(-1)$ on the second, has quadratic total section growth, but negative intersection with every line in the second component. No finite collection of codimension-one subvarieties can contain all those lines. Thus that weaker meaning would make part (ii) false. In dimension zero the positivity statements are vacuous and every line bundle is ample; the compatible bigness convention also regards it as big.