A Cartier divisor is locally represented by nonzero rational functions whose ratios on overlaps are regular units. It is principal when one global rational function represents all local data.
For a morphism of varieties , pull back local defining rational functions of a Cartier divisor whenever they remain nonzero on each component of . Their ratios remain regular units, defining . Equivalently, pull back the associated line bundle and its rational section. A dominant morphism always permits this construction.
For an integral domain with fraction field , realize Cartier divisors as invertible fractional ideals, with local divisor equation corresponding to the ideal . This is the convention. The maps in the displayed exact sequence are unit inclusion, , and . A principal fractional ideal is trivial as a divisor exactly when its generator is a unit. An invertible fractional ideal is trivial in the Picard group of a ring exactly when it is principal. Every rank-one projective module embeds in and produces an invertible fractional ideal, proving surjectivity. Local multiplication identifies with , so these are group homomorphisms.
On an integral scheme, for a Cartier divisor locally represented by , its divisor line bundle is the subsheaf of rational functions locally equal to . Unit ratios glue these free rank-one modules. Given a nonzero rational section of a line bundle , the maps identify that invertible sheaf with . Replacing by a nonzero rational multiple changes by a principal Cartier divisor.
A real Cartier divisor is a finite real linear combination of Cartier divisors. A rational Cartier divisor is defined analogously with rational coefficients; after multiplication by a common denominator it is Cartier.
A real Cartier divisor is ample if it is a positive real combination of ample Cartier divisors. Equivalently its numerical class lies in the ample cone. To recover an actual positive combination from the numerical condition, write the divisor in a finite Cartier basis and take nearby rational points in the inverse image of the open ample cone. A small rational simplex around the original coefficient vector expresses it as a positive convex combination of rational ample Cartier combinations; clearing denominators gives ample Cartier divisors.
Real linear equivalence means that is a finite real combination of principal Cartier divisors. Rational linear equivalence uses rational coefficients instead. Both imply numerical equivalence of divisors.
The positivity of a Cartier divisor can be measured by sections, intersection numbers, or its numerical class. Ample divisors give projective embeddings after taking a multiple; nef divisors are their numerical limits; big divisors have the maximum possible order of section growth. Nefness and bigness are different conditions.
A Cartier divisor is semiample if some positive multiple is a basepoint-free divisor, equivalently its divisor line bundle has a globally generated positive power. Such a power defines a Kodaira map with . Semiampleness implies nefness but need not imply ampleness: a fibre divisor of a morphism to a curve is a basic example.
A smooth rational curve with on a smooth projective surface is semiample and has Iitaka dimension one. Its normal bundle is trivial, so the restriction sequences for have quotient and zero quotient . The finite dimensions of decrease and stabilize. Restriction of sections to is then surjective; a lift of and the canonical section generate globally. Exactness also gives eventually.
A semiample divisor on an integral projective variety is ample if it has positive degree on every integral projective curve. Its Kodaira map cannot contract a positive-dimensional fibre, since such a fibre contains a curve and the pulled-back hyperplane bundle has degree zero there. Thus the morphism is proper and a quasi-finite morphism, hence a finite morphism. The finite pullback of an ample line bundle is ample.
If is an effective Cartier divisor on a projective scheme and is ample, then is semiample. The divisor restriction exact sequence and Serre vanishing make surjective for large . Their finite dimensions stabilize, so restriction on global sections is eventually surjective. Lift generators on ; off , the canonical section of generates. Together these generate , including on nonreduced .
A Cartier divisor on an integral -dimensional projective variety is big when for some and infinitely many positive integers . Equivalently, its Iitaka dimension is . Kodaira's lemma characterizes bigness by an ample-plus-effective decomposition, and the birational linear system criterion for bigness shows why this growth captures the full variety.
For ample rational Cartier classes on an integral projective -fold with , implies is big. Scale to very ample integral divisors. Choose an effective Cartier divisor . Repeated restriction gives : multiply each negatively twisted restriction by a section avoiding its associated points to inject it into . Asymptotic Riemann–Roch and Serre vanishing give the positive leading lower bound along sufficiently divisible section indices after undoing the scaling. No complex-analytic Morse theory or characteristic-zero vanishing is used.
Let be the finite normalization of an integral projective variety. The coherent sheaf is supported in dimension at most . For a Cartier divisor , the projection formula for sheaves and the resulting long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology give
The last step uses the polynomial bound for sections of a fixed divisor. Therefore the leading order growth, and hence bigness, is preserved in both directions. This handles nonnormal varieties without assuming a resolution of singularities in positive characteristic.
A big real divisor is an actual positive real combination of big Cartier divisors. Equivalently it is real linearly equivalent, or numerically equivalent, to an ample real divisor plus an effective real divisor. The rational approximation of an ample-plus-effective real divisor and Kodaira's lemma connect these formulations. Fujino's notes on big real divisors give the definition also for nonnormal varieties; bigness under finite normalization relates it to section growth.
Write a big real Cartier divisor on an integral projective variety as , with ample and effective real Cartier. Every curve outside has . Therefore curves negative against lie in finitely many support components of codimension one. On a projective scheme use componentwise bigness on a projective scheme and collect the supports on its finitely many integral components; codimension one is taken in the relevant component.
If a big class has ample restriction to every component of the effective support, then for any ample a sufficiently small makes nef. Use openness of the ample cone to keep and all ample with one finite minimum of bounds. Curves inside the support use these restrictions; curves outside use effectivity of . Thus one does not need a uniform choice over infinitely many subvarieties.
For a possibly reducible projective scheme, componentwise bigness means that a real Cartier class restricts to a big real divisor on every reduced irreducible component. This specifies the convention needed by positivity arguments that treat all curves. Maximal total section growth alone is weaker: on , the bundle has quadratic total growth but negative degree on every line in the second component. Thus its negative curves cannot be confined to finitely many divisors.
Suppose on an integral projective variety, where , is ample Cartier and is effective real Cartier. Then is an actual positive combination of big Cartier divisors.
Here is a finite-dimensional proof. First assume is normal. Express and in finite Cartier bases and write as a finite combination of principal Cartier divisors. The union of the supports of these finitely many divisors has finitely many prime components. Their integer multiplicities turn the equality into finitely many rational linear equations and effectivity into finitely many rational linear inequalities. The given coefficient tuple lies in a rational polyhedron. Take its smallest face; within that face it lies in the relative interior, and is an open condition. A small simplex with rational vertices in this relative interior contains the tuple. Each vertex gives with and . Clearing denominators and applying Kodaira's lemma shows that is a positive rational multiple of a big Cartier divisor. Taking the original convex weights proves the required actual equality.
If is nonnormal, pull the finite Cartier bases and the relation to its finite normalization and impose the same rational equations and effectivity inequalities there. The vertex divisors remain rational Cartier divisors on because they were constructed in bases from . They are big on the normalization, hence big on by bigness under finite normalization. This proves the same conclusion. Effectivity is used in the usual effective Cartier sense so that pullback is effective; arbitrary cycles on a nonnormal variety cannot be substituted without defining a compatible divisor theory.
The big cone in is open and convex: write a big class as ample plus effective, perturb only the ample summand, and use openness of the ample cone. For positive-dimensional , intersection with for any very ample divisor is strictly positive on every big class. Hence this cone contains no line and does not contain the zero class.
A Cartier divisor on an integral projective variety is big if and only if some multiple has a complete linear system of a divisor giving a rational map birational onto its image. Kodaira's lemma embeds a very ample subsystem in a suitable multiple. Conversely, algebraically independent elements among the section ratios give independent degree- section monomials, where . Smoothness is not necessary.
A Cartier divisor on an integral projective variety is big exactly when, for every ample divisor , some positive integer satisfies with effective. To prove the forward direction, subtract an effective high multiple of using the section subtraction lemma for big divisors, then add an effective representative of the remaining multiple. For the reverse direction, multiply sections of by the section of and use the ample Hilbert polynomial.
If is a big divisor and an effective Cartier divisor, infinitely many have . The divisor restriction exact sequence bounds the dimension lost upon restriction to by , using the polynomial bound for sections of a fixed divisor; this cannot exhaust the sections along the infinite growth sequence.
Two Cartier divisors are numerically equivalent when they have equal intersection numbers with every integral complete curve. A numerically trivial divisor has zero intersection with every such curve. Unlike linear equivalence of Cartier divisors, numerical equivalence does not require the same line bundle.
The finite-dimensional real vector space consists of real combinations of Cartier divisors modulo numerical equivalence of divisors. Its elements are numerical divisor classes. The space of curve classes paired with it is .
The nef cone is the closed convex cone of nef divisor classes. It is dual to the closed cone of curves. Its interior is the ample cone on a projective scheme.
The ample cone consists of real numerical divisor classes represented by ample real divisors. It is an open convex cone, and Kleiman's criterion identifies it with the interior of the nef cone.
The sum of a nef real Cartier class and an ample real Cartier class on a projective scheme is ample. By Kleiman's criterion, the ample cone is the interior of the nef cone. If a ball about an ample class lies in that convex cone, translating it by a nef class still lies in the cone. The sum is consequently still an interior point.
The closed cone of curves is the closure in of the convex cone generated by classes of integral curves. A nef divisor pairs nonnegatively with this entire closed cone. Its boundary can contain limiting classes which are not represented by one curve.
A line bundle is nef when its degree on every integral complete curve is nonnegative. Equivalently a Cartier divisor is nef when for every such curve. On a projective scheme, adding a positive ample class to a nef class makes it ample; taking limits in the intersection product shows that a nef divisor has nonnegative top self-intersection number.
For a nef divisor on an integral projective variety of dimension ,
Indeed, combine asymptotic Riemann–Roch with cohomology growth for nef twists. Thus its normalized section-growth limit is , and it is big exactly when .
A Cartier divisor is ample when its associated line bundle is ample. The Nakai–Moishezon criterion and Kleiman's criterion characterize this condition numerically.
In the notation of the toric basepoint-free criterion, the divisor is ample exactly when for each ray outside . Equivalently, the normal fan of its divisor polytope is the original fan.
// Target: geometry-and-topology.bigb
A Cartier divisor is ample if for every positive-dimensional integral closed subvariety some positive multiple restricts to a bundle with a nonzero section having a nonempty zero locus. Inductively the divisor is ample on all lower-dimensional subschemes. On an integral component the chosen section cuts out a nonempty effective Cartier divisor whose restriction bundle is ample. The restriction ampleness implies semiampleness for an effective divisor lemma makes the original divisor semiample. On a curve the vanishing section forces positive degree, so the semiample and curve-positive ampleness criterion proves ampleness.
A Cartier divisor on a projective scheme is ample exactly when for every positive-dimensional integral closed subvariety , including irreducible components. For the converse induct on dimension: restrictions to hyperplane sections are ample, so higher cohomology vanishing from an ample hyperplane restriction gives . A nonzero section vanishing at a chosen point then exists. The vanishing-section ampleness criterion finishes. Divergence alone does not imply a positive top-degree coefficient.
For a projective scheme, a divisor class is in the ample cone exactly when it is strictly positive on every nonzero element of the closed cone of curves. Equivalently, the ample cone is the interior of the nef cone. The projectivity assumption matters: the same characterization is not asserted here for arbitrary proper schemes.
An integral Cartier divisor on a projective scheme is ample if and only if for every positive-dimensional integral closed subvariety . Testing only curves is sufficient in dimension one, but not in higher dimensions.
A real Cartier class on a projective scheme is ample if and only if its top self-intersection on every positive-dimensional integral subvariety is positive. For the converse curve tests give nefness. Small ample perturbations and rational approximation give ample rational with satisfying the algebraic Morse inequality for ample divisors, hence bigness. Induction gives ample restrictions on codimension-one subvarieties; uniform ample subtraction from a big divisor with ample exceptional restrictions makes nef. The nef-plus-ample ampleness lemma concludes. For reducible schemes perform the finite component tests simultaneously.
Two Cartier divisors are linearly equivalent when their difference is a principal Cartier divisor. Their associated line bundles are then isomorphic, so their global section spaces have the same dimension. This definition works in every dimension.
A principal Cartier divisor is represented on every chart by the same nonzero rational function. It is linearly equivalent to zero and has zero intersection number with every complete curve.
An effective Cartier divisor is cut out locally by one non-zero-divisor; it is a codimension-one closed subscheme. On an integral scheme a nonzero global section of a line bundle defines such a divisor, possibly empty. On a nonreduced scheme a nonzero section need not be regular, so its zero locus need not be a Cartier divisor.
A relative effective divisor of degree on a smooth projective curve is an effective Cartier divisor in that is finite and flat of degree over . Its associated line bundle has degree on every fibre. The symmetric product of a curve represents these families and carries their universal divisor. Locally on a smooth coordinate chart, the divisor is described by a monic polynomial, whose coefficients are elementary symmetric functions of its points; this description includes collisions and works in positive characteristic.
A proper subvariety locally defined by one non-zero-divisor is an effective Cartier divisor. On an integral variety a nonzero local equation is automatically a non-zero-divisor. Its conormal sheaf is a line bundle, since via multiplication by . Allowing the zero equation would include the whole variety and would not give this conclusion.
For an effective Cartier divisor and any Cartier divisor , multiplication by a defining section of gives the displayed short exact sequence of sheaves. Its long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology compares sections and cohomology on with their restrictions to .
This is the full linear system of divisors, obtained by using every global section of the associated line bundle. For a Cartier divisor on an integral projective variety, the complete linear system consists of its effective representatives under linear equivalence of Cartier divisors. A basis of defines a rational map to projective space.
The Iitaka dimension of a Cartier divisor is the maximum dimension of the images of the rational maps given by its nonempty multiples . It is if all positive multiples have no sections. For an integral -dimensional projective variety it lies between zero and when nonnegative. The Kodaira dimension of the variety is the special case .
The movable part is , where is the fixed part. It has no fixed components. On a smooth algebraic surface its associated divisor is nef: for each curve choose a member avoiding that curve and use nonnegative local intersection multiplicities.
For a nonempty complete linear system of a divisor on a smooth projective variety, the coefficient of a prime divisor in its fixed part is the minimum of its multiplicities in all members. Multiplication by the section of identifies the sections of with those of .
A fixed component is a prime divisor appearing in every member of a complete linear system of a divisor. This concerns divisorial components; a linear system can have isolated basepoints even when it has no fixed component.
A divisor is basepoint-free when its global sections have no common zero. Its complete linear system therefore defines a Kodaira map everywhere.
For an invariant Cartier divisor on a complete smooth toric variety, let satisfy for rays in a maximal cone . The divisor is basepoint-free exactly when every lies in the lattice polytope of a toric divisor . Its character section then trivializes the line bundle on the entire chart .
// Target: geometry-and-topology.bigb
A very ample divisor is a divisor whose associated line bundle is a very ample line bundle. A divisor is very ample when its complete linear system defines a closed embedding into projective space.
On a smooth projective curve of genus , every divisor of degree at least is very ample. Riemann--Roch shows that its sections separate distinct points and tangent directions by comparing with and .
A hyperplane divisor on projective space is the effective Cartier divisor cut out by one nonzero linear homogeneous polynomial. Its class generates .
For a smooth integral projective variety over , a general hyperplane section in a projective embedding is smooth; if its dimension is at least two, the section is also irreducible. More general statements concern linear systems and their base loci. The smoothness statement is developed in the Stacks Project's Bertini section.
If a projective line does not contain the projective plane curve , its hyperplane-section divisor is
where is the intersection multiplicity. The Bézout theorem gives .
For a Cartier divisor , the associated line bundle has local sections given by meromorphic functions satisfying . Its canonical meromorphic section has divisor .
The Cartier class group is the group of Cartier divisors modulo principal Cartier divisors. On an integral scheme it is naturally .

Ancestors (5)

  1. Algebraic geometry
  2. Geometry and topology
  3. Area of mathematics
  4. Mathematics
  5. Home

Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.