For an integral projective curve on a smooth projective surface, blowing up a point of multiplicity gives . The intersection formula for blowing up a surface and canonical divisor formula for a surface blowup yield and . Substitute both in the arithmetic adjunction formula on a smooth surface. This does not require the transformed curve to be smooth.
Blow up the distinct singular points of the integral projective curve, once at each original point, and let be its strict transform of an algebraic subvariety. Write for the pullback of a projective line and for the algebraic exceptional divisors. The multiplicity of a plane curve at a point and the intersection formula for blowing up a surface give
The canonical divisor formula for a surface blowup gives . Applying the arithmetic adjunction formula on a smooth surface, rather than a formula requiring a smooth strict transform, yields
and hence
The strict transform of an algebraic subvariety is still an integral projective curve. Its arithmetic genus is , even if some singularities remain. Therefore the plane curve singularity multiplicity bound is
The argument uses only one blowup of a smooth algebraic surface at each original singular point; it does not assume these blowups resolve every singularity.
Let . The arithmetic adjunction formula on a smooth surface gives
We first exclude , following the PDF's hint and the finiteness proved in (a).
If , adjunction and force and . An integral projective curve of arithmetic genus zero is a smooth rational curve: normalization and the nonnegative singularity-length correction show both normalization genus and singularity correction vanish. Part (iii) makes semiample. Choose a basepoint-free . Over the infinite algebraically closed field, a general section avoids containing any of the finitely many curves of as a component. Its effective divisor then has , but , a contradiction.
If , Riemann–Roch theorem for algebraic surfaces and Serre duality show is unbounded. Indeed for , because the latter divisor has negative intersection with a fixed ample divisor. Hence
There is therefore some with , giving a section whose divisor does not contain . The canonical section of does not vanish identically along any other curve. A general linear combination of these two sections consequently contains none of the finite set , again contradicting its negative canonical intersection. Thus .
Now put and . Adjunction gives
It follows that and . Hence
The general-section argument only avoids finitely many proper linear subspaces, so it works over any algebraically closed field, including positive characteristic.