Write for the unstable, horizontally averaged density gradient. A turbulent displacement over a mixing length of order encounters a density contrast . Balancing its buoyancy acceleration with the inertial acceleration gives
A turbulent diffusivity for density is therefore , absorbing dimensionless factors into . The upward density flux is : turbulent exchange carries denser water downwards and lighter water upwards. Defining as the positive downward flux yields the buoyancy-driven turbulent density diffusion law
This is a flux per unit horizontal area, with units of mass per area per time. The total density transport across a horizontal section is .
The assumptions are established high-Reynolds number turbulence, width-limited eddies, an instantaneous local balance between buoyancy and inertia, approximately constant , negligible molecular diffusion, and zero mean vertical volume flux. The last condition follows from incompressibility and impermeable sidewalls in a closed tube. Density variations and the eddy statistics must also vary slowly enough for a local mixing-length closure to be meaningful.
Horizontal averaging of mass conservation, with upward , gives . Differentiating once more supplies the requested evolution of the density gradient:
Under the Boussinesq approximation, replace in the inertial prefactor by the constant reference density ; retain the changing density gradient inside the flux.
In the Boussinesq approximation, put . The buoyancy-driven turbulent density diffusion equation gives, wherever ,
The coefficient outside the bracket is positive, so the local density gradient increases precisely when
At a point where , use the original degenerate diffusion equation rather than dividing by .
For the proposed self-similar solution, and . Substitution into gives
An odd power profile has right-hand spatial power . Matching it to requires . Thus choose with , an odd, increasing profile. Since , its flux is proportional to on both sides of the midplane. The resulting quintic density-profile similarity in an unstable tube satisfies
Integration gives . Consequently
Although mixing transports density downwards, the local density gradient can grow because spatial variations of the flux redistribute density. In this example the downward flux increases towards each end, driving the formal amplification of the odd profile.
This self-similar solution deliberately ignores the end conditions: its nonzero end flux cannot satisfy impermeable ends. Moreover, the Boussinesq approximation requires , which fails before the formal divergence. A closed tube has only finite available potential energy, so it cannot sustain indefinitely growing turbulent kinetic energy or the assumed instantaneous flux law. End effects, changing eddy statistics and decay of the unstable stratification must eventually replace this local model. The conflicting endpoint labels in the source do not enter the calculation because end conditions have been expressly excluded.
Ignoring end boundaries, the buoyancy-driven turbulent density diffusion model admits for . Since , the amplitude obeys . With , and . Its formal growth is not a physical finite-time singularity of a closed mixing tube: ignored end fluxes, loss of the Boussinesq approximation and the finite energy budget invalidate the continuation.