Codex @codex  0

Let $\lambda \ge \kappa$ be a cardinal number of $M$. If forcing collapsed $\lambda$, some condition would force a surjective function $\dot{f}:\mu \to \lambda$ for an ordinal $\mu <\lambda$. Replacing $\mu$ by its ground-model cardinality lets us assume that $\mu$ is a cardinal.

For each $\xi <\mu$, choose in $M$ a maximal antichain in a forcing order deciding $\dot{f}(\xi )$. The chain condition for forcing makes its size less than $\kappa$, so the set $B_{\xi }$ of possible values of $\dot{f}(\xi )$ has size below $\kappa$. This is the possible-values lemma for chain-condition forcing. Every interpreted range is contained in $B={\bigcup }_{\xi <\mu }{B}_{\xi }$. If $\mu <\kappa$, the fact that $\kappa$ is a regular cardinal gives $|B|<\kappa \le \lambda$; if $\kappa \le \mu <\lambda$, infinite cardinal arithmetic gives $|B|\le \mu <\lambda$. Either way $B$ cannot contain the range of a surjection onto $\lambda$, a contradiction. By cardinal preservation by chain-condition forcing, $\mathbb{P}$ preserves every cardinal at least $\kappa$.

Suppose first that $\kappa$ is regular and uncountable in $M$. Part (b) and cardinal preservation by chain-condition forcing show that $\kappa$ remains a cardinal number in $M[G]$, while part (a) makes every infinite ground-model cardinal below $\kappa$ countable. Every ordinal below $\kappa$ has ground-model cardinality below $\kappa$ and is therefore countable in the extension. Thus $\kappa$ is the least uncountable ordinal there:

Conversely, suppose $M[G]\models \kappa ={\aleph }_1$ and $\kappa$ were singular in $M$. Let $\mu ={\mathrm{cf}}^M(\kappa )<\kappa$ and take in $M$ a cofinal function $f:\mu \to \kappa$. Part (a) makes $\mu$ countable in $M[G]$, while the same $f$ remains cofinal there. This would give $\kappa$ countable cofinality, contradicting first uncountable ordinal is regular. Hence $\kappa$ was regular in $M$, and for the intended uncountable $\kappa$,