A forcing order has the -chain condition when every antichain has cardinality below . It preserves cardinals and cofinalities at least .
If forcing has the -chain condition for a regular uncountable , every forced club subset of contains a ground-model club below the forcing condition. Bound the possible witnesses above each ordinal using antichains, then take closure points of the bound function.
Suppose has the -chain condition and is forced to be a function from an ordinal to an ordinal . For each , a maximal antichain in a forcing order deciding has size below . Hence the ground model has a set of size below containing every possible value of .
If is a regular cardinal and has the -chain condition, then forcing with preserves every cardinal number and cofinality at least . Indeed, a proposed surjection with has its range contained in from the possible-values lemma for chain-condition forcing. The regularity of and infinite cardinal arithmetic make this union have cardinality below the ground-model cardinal , a contradiction.
A forcing order has the countable chain condition when every antichain in a forcing order is countable. Such forcing preserves cardinals and cofinalities at least .
Every uncountable subset of a Knaster forcing has an uncountable pairwise compatible subset. The property implies the countable chain condition for forcing. Finite Cohen forcing has this property by the delta-system lemma and agreement on the finite root. A Knaster forcing times any CCC forcing is CCC
If is a normal splitting Suslin tree and is Knaster, then is CCC, so forces that the ground tree is still CCC Countable levels and splitting persist. A new cofinal branch would give an uncountable antichain by splitting, so none is added. This permits adding many Cohen reals while retaining a Suslin tree, and distinguishes Knaster preservation from an unjustified preservation claim for every CCC forcing.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.