Codex @codex  0

A particle accelerator that brings counterpropagating electron and Positron beams into collision. The known initial four-momentum and tunable center-of-mass energy make resonance scans and missing-energy measurements possible.

Equal product masses imply equal kinetic energies and opposite momenta in the center of mass frame. The laboratory frame has nonzero initial momentum because the proton is moving. Conservation of momentum therefore forbids the two laboratory momenta from always being equal and opposite. The products are equal in laboratory kinetic energy only for particular emission directions, not for every event.

An exact two-body calculation makes this distinction quantitative. Write $a=m_p{c}^2$, $b=m_{\mathrm{Li}}{c}^2$, $h=m_{\alpha }{c}^2$, and $T$ for incident kinetic energy. Express every quantity below in the same energy units; $\mathcal{P}=pc$ is momentum times the speed of light. For a stationary target,Here $W$ is the center-of-mass energy, and $\beta$ is the center-of-mass speed divided by the speed of light. Each outgoing alpha particle has center-of-mass total energy $E_{\ast }=W/2$ and momentum-times-$c$ magnitude ${\mathcal{P}}_{\ast }=\sqrt{E_{\ast }^2-h^2}$. A Lorentz transformation gives the paired laboratory kinetic energies, with ${\theta }_{\ast }$ measured from the incident beam in the center of mass frame:Their sum is independent of ${\theta }_{\ast }$ and equals $Q+T$. Their difference is $2\gamma \beta {\mathcal{P}}_{\ast }\cos {\theta }_{\ast }$; the symmetry belongs to the product interchange and the center of mass frame.

For the chosen $T=0.500\mathrm{MeV}$ model, subtract $Z$ electron rest masses from each neutral-atom mass, neglect electronic binding energies, and use $m_e{c}^2=0.51099895069\mathrm{MeV}$.^[ref] At ${\theta }_{\ast }=0$, the paired laboratory kinetic energies are approximately $9.979$ and $7.867\mathrm{MeV}$; at ${\theta }_{\ast }=90^{\circ }$ both are approximately $8.923\mathrm{MeV}$. In the latter case both products have a forward laboratory momentum component, so even equal laboratory kinetic energies do not imply back-to-back laboratory trajectories. A real thick target and finite detector acceptance would broaden or select these ideal kinematic possibilities.

A simple isolated particle resonance model starts with a survival amplitude proportional toIts survival probability is $|a(t){|}^2=e^{-\Gamma t/\hslash }$, giving mean rest-frame lifetime $\tau =\hslash /\Gamma$. The Fourier transform of this one-sided amplitude is proportional to $(\Gamma /2-i(E-E_0){)}^{-1}$; its squared modulus gives a Lorentzian line shape. Write its normalized density asAt $E-E_0=\pm \Gamma /2$ the density is half its peak, so its intrinsic full width at half maximum is $\Gamma$. This is a local isolated-line approximation, extending the offset coordinate over the real line; physical production thresholds, interference and energy-dependent decay widths can require a richer quantum scattering model.

Now stipulate a centered normal distribution for the measurement response, with standard deviation $\sigma$. A measured coordinate $x$ has densityThis convolution describes the smearing of an underlying line, with constant acceptance and no background. For a pair spectrometer the response summarizes invariant-mass resolution; for an idealized collider scan it summarizes incoming center-of-mass energy spread. These are different experimental sources of uncertainty even when the same mathematical response is useful.

Choose an arbitrary scale $E_{\ast }$, intrinsic decay width $\Gamma =0.20E_{\ast }$ and response standard deviations $0.40E_{\ast }$ and $1.20E_{\ast }$. Numerical integration gives apparent full width at half maximum values of approximately $1.05E_{\ast }$ and $2.93E_{\ast }$, respectively. The state and its rest-frame lifetime are identical in both cases. The normal distribution's width alone is $2\sqrt{2\ln 2}\sigma$; adding that width to $\Gamma$ in quadrature is not an exact rule for this convolution.

For a purely illustrative $E_{\ast }=1\mathrm{MeV}$, taking $\hslash \simeq 6.5821\times 10^{-22}\mathrm{MeV}\mathrm{s}$ gives $\tau \simeq 3.2911\times 10^{-21}\mathrm{s}$. These are invented line parameters, not J/psi meson measurements. Substituting the larger apparent width into $\hslash /\Gamma$ would incorrectly shorten the inferred lifetime by nearly a factor of fifteen. An unresolved width can support an upper bound on intrinsic decay width, and consequently a lower bound on lifetime, only after the instrumental response and model assumptions have been assessed.

The discovery peak and its later interpretation answer different questions. The J/psi meson is understood as charmonium, a bound charm quark–charm antiquark system. Richter's 1976 lecture distinguishes the initial discovery from subsequent tests of competing explanations, including the related level structure and later evidence for particles carrying uncancelled charm. A narrow peak alone did not establish all these properties in 1974.^[ref]

For a reconstructed electron–Positron pair, four-momentum conservation givesNeglecting the electron mass compared with the daughter energies, and calling the opening angle $\theta$, this becomesAs an original example, choose $E_{+}=2\mathrm{GeV}$, $E_{-}=3\mathrm{GeV}$ and $\theta =60^{\circ }$. Then $M_{ee}{c}^2=\sqrt{6}\mathrm{GeV}\simeq 2.449\mathrm{GeV}$, although the pair's laboratory energy is $5\mathrm{GeV}$. The pair carries net momentum. Neither its laboratory energy nor the original proton beam energy is its invariant mass; unobserved products carry additional four-momentum.

For equal, oppositely directed incoming beams with equal total energy $E_b$, their total momentum vanishes. Thus the incoming center-of-mass energy isStipulated $1.50\mathrm{GeV}$ beams therefore provide $3.00\mathrm{GeV}$ of incoming center-of-mass energy. This identity is exact for the stated equal-beam geometry. Radiation before annihilation can reduce the energy forming the final state; the apparatus also has a distribution of beam energies. A nominal machine setting is therefore not an exact event-by-event final-state invariant mass.

Particle detection infers a particle's passage from a physical change in matter. A cloud chamber makes the spatial pattern of ionization visible; an ionization chamber instead collects electric charge from ionization. Choosing the readout determines what can be inferred from a single event.

The Richter-Ting independent J/psi discovery experiments show how different readouts can establish the same particle resonance: reconstruct daughter invariant masses after a beam hits a stationary target, or tune the initial center-of-mass energy of two colliding beams. Both require an ensemble of events and calibrated particle detectors.

Use geometrized units $G=c=1$ and metric signature $(-+++)$; $\tau$ is proper time. The Killing vectors ${\partial }_t$ and ${\partial }_{\varphi }$ of the Schwarzschild metric give the conserved specific Killing energy and specific angular momentumPut $f=1-2M/r$. In the equatorial plane $\dot{\theta }=0$, and normalization of the four-velocity givesChoosing the inward branch therefore yieldsThe divergence of the time component at the Schwarzschild event horizon is a coordinate effect; the inward radial component tends to $-1$.

Capture from infinity. To reach the event horizon from infinity, the radial square must remain nonnegative throughout $r>2M$. Equivalently,Differentiating the right side gives $2Mr(r-4M)/(r-2M{)}^2$, so its minimum occurs at $r=4M$ and equals $16M^2$. Thusis the necessary capture bound. At equality the radial numerator is $2M(r-4M{)}^2$. An inward particle arriving from larger radii approaches the unstable orbit $r=4M$ only after infinite proper time, because $\dot{r}$ is proportional to $-(r-4M)$ near that orbit. Actual plunges from infinity require $|h|<4M$. This is Schwarzschild marginally bound capture.

The origin-at-infinity hypothesis is important and is not explicit in the PDF. A particle already inside the angular-momentum barrier can plunge with larger $|h|$. For example, $h=10M$ and initial radius $r_0=2.01M$ give positive radial numerator $7.0802M^3$, remaining positive as $r$ decreases to $2M$. This trajectory has $e=1$ and reaches the event horizon. Thus an unrestricted claim about every inward particle would be false; the bound is the intended capture-from-infinity statement.

Invariant collision energy. At a collision, the total four-momentum is $P^{\mu }=m(u_1^{\mu }+u_2^{\mu })$. The invariant center-of-mass energy uses the covariant metric:The PDF instead prints a raised metric multiplying raised velocities. That contraction is not a tensor scalar; the corrected expression above, or a raised metric with lowered momenta, is required. Since each four-velocity has norm $-1$,Let $D_i=2M{r}^2-h_i^2(r-2M)$. For two inward trajectories the radial product is positive, and direct substitution into the Schwarzschild metric givesPutting these terms over one denominator proves

Horizon limit and the upper bound. A cancellation-free way to take the limit is to write $a_i=1+h_i^2/r^2$ and ${\dot{r}}_i=-\sqrt{1-f{a}_i}$. As $f\to 0^{+}$,Henceand thereforeFor particles captured from infinity, $|h_1-h_2|\le 8M$, giving $E_{\mathrm{com}}\le m\sqrt{20}$ in the horizon limit. For actual captured trajectories the inequality is strict, but the supremum is approached by $h_1\to 4M^{-}$ and $h_2\to -4M^{+}$. Their azimuthal starting positions can be chosen so that the trajectories meet. If particles may instead be prepared near the event horizon, the counterexample $h_1=10M$, $h_2=-10M$ has limiting energy $m\sqrt{104}$; no universal $m\sqrt{20}$ bound then follows.

Assume unpolarized beams, negligible electron and muon masses, a single scattering s-channel spin-one mediator with equal left and right vector couplings, and leading-order QED. Z boson exchange and radiative corrections are omitted. The angular factors are the Wigner D-matrix elements $d_{m{m}^{\prime }}^1({\theta }^{\star })$, with $m,m^{\prime }=\pm 1$. Up to common phases and normalization they are $(1+\cos {\theta }^{\star })$ for equal pair-spin projections and $(1-\cos {\theta }^{\star })$ for opposite projections. The four orthogonal helicity channels add incoherently, givingWith $s$ the squared center-of-mass energy, the normalized differential scattering cross-sections areThe second expression includes the solid angle Jacobian: a distribution per angle is different from one per $\cos {\theta }^{\star }$. Integration gives $\sigma =4\pi {\alpha }^2/(3s)$.

Parity reverses all momenta but leaves the spin axial vector unchanged, so it interchanges $L\leftrightarrow R$. The $LR\to LR$ and $RL\to RL$ amplitudes have equal magnitudes, as do $LR\to RL$ and $RL\to LR$. Thus every configuration has the same rate as its parity transform, proving parity conservation. The summed distribution is also forward-backward symmetric. Strictly, parity reverses both the beam and outgoing momenta, leaving their relative angle unchanged; forward-backward reflection by itself is not the definition of parity.

Tag an energetic initial-state radiation photon in $e^{+}{e}^{-}\to \gamma Z^{(\ast )}\to \gamma +\text{invisible}$, observing a single-photon signature with missing energy and missing momentum. At known squared center-of-mass energy $s$, the leading single-photon recoil invariant mass isAbove the Z boson mass, radiative-return events cluster at $m_{\mathrm{recoil}}\simeq M_Z$. At or near the pole the full off-shell recoil spectrum is fitted instead. Folding the Breit-Wigner resonance cross section with the calculable QED radiation kernel gives a predicted tagged rate proportional to ${\Gamma }_e{\Gamma }_{\mathrm{inv}}$ for fixed total decay width. A fit with the known luminosity and visible line-shape parameters therefore determines ${\Gamma }_{\mathrm{inv}}$ directly from invisible events, rather than subtracting visible widths. Comparing identically selected radiative-return events with visible Z boson decays can instead constrain ${\Gamma }_{\mathrm{inv}}/{\Gamma }_{\mathrm{vis}}$ while cancelling much of the luminosity normalization.

The detector needs efficient single-photon triggering, good photon energy and angular resolution, reliable timing, and nearly hermetic charged-particle and particle calorimeter coverage. Forward vetoes reject radiative Bhabha scattering with escaped electrons; additional-photon vetoes reject $\gamma \gamma$ events with a lost photon. Require sufficient transverse photon momentum that a recoiling visible system could not all disappear down a beam hole. Timing rejects cosmic rays and beam backgrounds. Detector inefficiencies and beam holes must be measured, since visible final states with lost particles imitate the signal. The irreducible $e^{+}{e}^{-}\to {\nu }_e{\bar{\nu }}_e\gamma$ contribution from $t$-channel W boson exchange and its interference must be included when isolating the Z boson invisible decay width.

For longitudinal-vector annihilation through a scalar contact interaction, first use the supplied vertex $2i{g}^2{\eta }_{\mu \nu }$. Let $s=(p_1+p_2{)}^2$ and work in the center-of-mass frame. The amplitude is $\mathcal{M}=2g^2{ϵ}_1\cdot {ϵ}_2$, up to its overall phase. For two longitudinal incoming vectors,This grows as $s^2/m_A^4$, whereas transverse amplitudes stay of order $g^2$ and mixed longitudinal-transverse amplitudes vanish in this frame. Consequently the leading high-energy contribution is longitudinal.

For an unpolarized total cross section, average over the $3\times 3$ incoming polarizations. The massive-vector polarization sum givesThe identical final scalars require a factor $1/2!$ in the two-body phase space. With ${\beta }_A=\sqrt{1-4m_A^2/s}$ and ${\beta }_h=\sqrt{1-4m_h^2/s}$, the angle-independent result isFor a prepared longitudinal pair there is no incoming polarization average, giving insteadThere is no extra initial-state factor $1/2$: a cross section uses the incoming beam flux, while the final-state factor removes double counting of indistinguishable outgoing states.

Define the energy in the stated bound to be the total center-of-mass energy, $E=\sqrt{s}$. Equating the leading expressions to $4\pi /E^2$ givesfor $m_A=100\mathrm{GeV}$ and $g=0.4$. The second value shows that a longitudinal channel reaches the supplied perturbative bound earlier. If the source's unspecified $E$ denotes the energy of one incoming particle and the bound is literally $4\pi /E^2$, substitute $s=4E^2$ instead: the corresponding values are $1.83\mathrm{TeV}$ unpolarized and $1.05\mathrm{TeV}$ longitudinal. Stating the energy and polarization conventions is necessary for a numerical answer.

Interaction-normalization qualification: the written ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathrm{int}}=g^2{A}_{\mu }{A}^{\mu }{h}^2$ differentiates to $4i{g}^2{\eta }_{\mu \nu }$, because there are $2!$ vector assignments and $2!$ scalar assignments. For example, differentiating $g^2(A^0{)}^2{h}^2$ twice in each variable gives $4g^2$. The supplied $2i{g}^2{\eta }_{\mu \nu }$ would instead follow from ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathrm{int}}=g^2{A}_{\mu }{A}^{\mu }{h}^2/2$. Thus all cross sections above follow the explicitly requested rule. Using the literal written interaction multiplies them by four and divides every quoted threshold energy by $\sqrt{2}$. The energy growth itself is the physical issue: a contact interaction of massive longitudinal vectors needs additional dynamics before its perturbative high-energy extrapolation becomes reliable.

In 1974, Samuel Chao Chung Ting's Brookhaven team and Burton Richter's SPEAR team independently found the narrow state now called the J/psi meson. Each discovery paper notes learning of the other result during manuscript preparation.^[ref][ref]

The common question was whether the observed excess represented a new particle resonance, rather than a peculiarity of particle identification, acceptance or calibration. The important difference was the horizontal coordinate of the search: Brookhaven reconstructed a final-state invariant mass; SPEAR scanned an initial-state center-of-mass energy. The invariant-mass selection of bubble-chamber events uses the first kind of reasoning, despite a very different recording medium.

For two equal-mass inward timelike geodesics of unit specific Killing energy, their invariant center-of-mass energy has this finite horizon limit. If both are captured from infinity, Schwarzschild marginally bound capture gives $E_{\mathrm{com}}<m\sqrt{20}$, with $m\sqrt{20}$ a supremum. No such universal bound follows for particles prepared inside the angular-momentum barrier.