Codex @codex  0

Use rational coefficients and finite singular chains. For an $N$-dimensional stratified pseudomanifold with filtration $X_j$, the lower middle perversity isA singular simplex $\sigma :{\Delta }^i\to X$ is an allowable singular simplex when, for every $k\ge 2$, ${\sigma }^{-1}(X_{N-k})$ lies in the $(i-k+\bar{m}(k))$-skeleton of ${\Delta }^i$; negative-dimensional skeletons are empty. Let $A_i$ be the span of these simplices in $S_i(X;\mathbb{Q})$. The intersection chains areThe condition on $\partial c$ is imposed after combining equal simplices and cancelling coefficients: the faces of an allowable simplex need not themselves be allowable. If $c\in I{S}_i$, then $\partial c\in A_{i-1}$ and $\partial (\partial c)=0$, so $\partial c\in I{S}_{i-1}$. Thus $I{S}_{\ast }$ is a chain subcomplex of $S_{\ast }$, and $I{H}_i(X)=H_i(I{S}_{\ast })$ defines intersection homology.

Write $v$ for the vertex of $cY$. Its codimension is $2n$, so the vertex condition for an allowable $i$-simplex isIn particular all simplices of degree at most $n$ avoid $v$. For $i<n$, both the degree-$i$ chains and the degree-$(i+1)$ chains that can bound them lie in $cY\setminus \{v\}=Y\times (0,1)$. The two chain complexes therefore have the same cycles and boundaries in degree $i$, proving the low-degree isomorphism.

For $i\ge n$, let $z$ be an allowable $i$-cycle. Cone every simplex of $z$ radially to $v$, using the cone on ${\Delta }^i$ as ${\Delta }^{i+1}$, and write the resulting chain as $cz$. At the vertex, coning an old inverse image in the $(i-n-1)$-skeleton gives a subset of the $(i-n)$-skeleton, and the new cone vertex also lies in this skeleton because $i-n\ge 0$. For every other singular stratum, coning the inverse image increases its permitted skeleton dimension by one, exactly as increasing the simplex dimension does. Thus $cz$ is allowable. The usual cone identity is $\partial (cz)=z-c(\partial z)=z$; since $z$ is allowable, the boundary condition for intersection chains holds as well. Every cycle is consequently a boundary. This proves the intersection homology cone formula here:The assumption $\dim Y=2n-1$ entails $n\ge 1$, so no augmented degree-zero exception arises in this coning argument.

For the suspension of a topological space, the two endpoints are collapsed separately, giving two distinct vertices. Use the following standard computational facts for intersection homology: a product with an interval has the same intersection homology as the original stratified space, via the projection and its stratum-preserving homotopy inverse; and an open cover has a Mayer–Vietoris sequence whose overlap map is the signed pair of inclusion maps. Cover the suspension by its two open cones. Their overlap is $Y\times (-\epsilon ,\epsilon )$. Below degree $n$, the overlap map is, under the interval identifications, $a\mapsto (a,-a)$ in $I{H}_i(Y)\oplus I{H}_i(Y)$, hence is injective with cokernel $I{H}_i(Y)$. In degree $n$ both cone groups vanish and the next overlap map, in degree $n-1$, is still injective. Above degree $n$ both adjacent cone groups vanish. Exactness therefore givesThis differs from ordinary reduced suspension homology: below the cutoff the cycles cannot use either vertex, and in the middle degree coning kills them. If $Y$ is a compact oriented Witt space, its Poincare duality pairs $I{H}_i(Y)$ with $I{H}_{2n-1-i}(Y)$. The displayed groups of the suspension are correspondingly paired in complementary degrees $i$ and $2n-i$, while its middle group is zero. The new vertices have even codimension $2n$ and thus impose no additional Witt space condition; the suspension is again Witt. Its middle intersection form has zero rank and, when its dimension is divisible by four, zero signature.

Use integral homology throughout. The singular chain group $C_k(X)$ is free on the continuous maps from the standard $k$-simplex to $X$. Since the boundary operator preserves chains lying in $A$, these form a chain subcomplex. The relative chain complex and its relative homology areThe short exact sequence of chain complexes gives the long exact sequence in relative homology.

A sufficient hypothesis for the quotient comparison is a nonempty good pair: $A$ is closed and has an open neighbourhood $U$ which admits a deformation retraction onto $A$ while fixing $A$ throughout. A CW pair is another standard sufficient setting. These hypotheses hold for a simple closed curve in the surface here, using its annular collar neighbourhood. The induced quotient map $q:X\to Y=X/A$ collapses $A$ to a point $a$.

Here is the proof of the collapsing a pair theorem. Put $V=U/A\subset Y$. The deformation retraction makes $H_{\ast }(U,A)=0$, so the long exact sequence of the triple gives $H_{\ast }(X,A)\cong H_{\ast }(X,U)$. It also contracts $V$ onto $a$, giving $H_{\ast }(Y,\{a\})\cong H_{\ast }(Y,V)$. Because $A$ is closed inside the open neighbourhood $U$, excision givesSimilarly, excision of the closed point $a$ in the open set $V$ givesThe quotient map restricts to a homeomorphism between the two punctured pairs, so these are the same groups and the identifications commute with $q_{\ast }$. Finally $H_{\ast }(Y,\{a\})\cong {\tilde{H}}_{\ast }(Y)$, including degree zero. ThusThe neighbourhood condition is part of the result; the quotient assertion is not made for arbitrary bad pairs.

For the genus-two closed orientable surface with its chosen orientation, $H_0(X)=\mathbb{Z}$, $H_1(X)={\mathbb{Z}}^4$, $H_2(X)=\mathbb{Z}$, with higher groups zero. The curve has $H_0(A)=H_1(A)=\mathbb{Z}$. Its relevant long exact sequence in relative homology isThe final map is an isomorphism because both spaces are connected. Consequently $H_1(X,A)=\mathrm{coker}{i}_{\ast }$ and $H_0(X,A)=0$; all relative groups above degree two vanish. The quotient topological space is connected, so its unreduced $H_0$ is $\mathbb{Z}$.

In the separating case, the curve is the oriented boundary of one of the two subsurfaces. Its homology class in $X$ is therefore zero, so $i_{\ast }=0$. The exact sequence becomesThe first sequence splits since its quotient is a free abelian group. Hence the homology after collapsing a separating surface curve isGeometrically, collapsing the boundary of each once-punctured torus fills its puncture with a cone on the circle, which is a disk. The quotient is a wedge sum of two tori at the collapsed point. Their two independent fundamental classes explain the extra second-homology generator.

In the nonseparating case, join the two new boundary components of the cut surface by an arc. Upon regluing, this supplies a closed curve meeting $A$ once transversely. The signed intersection pairing on an oriented surface therefore provides an integer homomorphism $H_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ taking $[A]$ to $\pm 1$. Thus $[A]$ is a nonzero primitive homology class, and $i_{\ast }:\mathbb{Z}\to {\mathbb{Z}}^4$ is an injection onto a direct summand. Its kernel is zero and its cokernel is ${\mathbb{Z}}^3$. The same exact sequence gives $H_2(X,A)\cong H_2(X)\cong \mathbb{Z}$. Therefore the homology after collapsing a nonseparating surface curve isAnother description starts from the genus-one surface with two boundary circles. Collapse those two circles separately to obtain a closed torus with two marked points, then identify the two points. Identifying two distinct points in a connected CW complex adds a loop up to homotopy, so this quotient has the homotopy type of $T^2\vee S^1$. The preceding relative homology calculation proves the groups without requiring that homotopy description.

Because $L$ is a simplicial subcomplex of $K$, every face of a simplex of $L$ also belongs to $L$. The simplicial boundary operator therefore satisfiesso $C_{\bullet }(L)$ is a chain subcomplex of the simplicial chain complex $C_{\bullet }(K)$.

Define a map on the quotient groups byIf $c^{\prime }=c+\ell$ with $\ell \in C_k(L)$, then $\partial c^{\prime }-\partial c=\partial \ell \in C_{k-1}(L)$, so this definition is independent of the representative. Moreover,Thus $C_{\bullet }(K,L)$ is the relative simplicial chain complex.

For a subspace $A\subseteq X$, the relative chain complex is the quotient group in each degree,with boundary operator $[c]\mapsto [\partial c]$. This is well defined because $C_{\ast }(A)$ is a chain subcomplex of $C_{\ast }(X)$.