For a group and a normal subgroup , the quotient group is the set of cosets , with operationIts identity element is the coset , and the inverse element of is . A quotient group treats all elements within one coset as the same input while retaining a consistent operation on the classes. The normal subgroup condition is what makes this operation independent of which representatives are chosen. [ref]
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/18-703-modern-algebra-spring-2013/ecdbd211f736b3ac92379dea05b34491_MIT18_703S13_pra_l_9.pdf. McKernan, MIT 18.703, Theorem 9.1: quotient-group construction
.Take the additive group and . Since is an abelian group, is a normal subgroup. There are three elements in the quotient group:Adding two copies of gives ; adding and gives . Hence the quotient group has the addition table of . It does not select one representative and discard the others: its elements are the entire cosets.
Identifying residues differing by three turns a six-element cyclic group into a three-element quotient group
. Details. This is useful whenever distinctions within a normal subgroup should be ignored. For example, the sign of a permutation retains only even or odd parity of a permutation in . Its group kernel is the alternating group , and the quotient group has two elements. The first isomorphism theorem explains why a group homomorphism's image is a quotient group of its domain.
For a normal subgroup of , projection to the quotient group gives a bijection between subgroups of containing and subgroups of . The maps are and inverse image under projection. Their two composites are identities because each relevant subgroup is a union of cosets of . They preserve inclusions and normality; consequently a composition series in a quotient lifts to a subnormal chain above with the same composition factors.
The quotient map of groups sends each group element to its coset modulo a normal subgroup. It is a surjective group homomorphism, with group kernel exactly . In the additive six-element example, it sends to , to , and to . The quotient map of groups records the identification that produces the new group.
If is a normal subgroup, changing representatives to and , where , givesThe chosen representatives therefore give the same coset. Conversely, suppose the rule defines an operation on left cosets. Since for , multiplying by gives , hence . Applying this inclusion for every and proves , so is a normal subgroup. This makes normality exactly the condition needed to carry group operation to these classes.
Let be a normal subgroup of , and let be the quotient map of groups. If a group homomorphism has group kernel containing , there is exactly one group homomorphism with . Its value is forced: . Every measurement by a group homomorphism that ignores can thus be performed on the quotient group directly. This is the universal property of the construction.
For a surjection with kernel , inverse image and image give inverse order-preserving bijections between subgroups of and subgroups of containing . They preserve index. For an arbitrary subgroup , , so .
// Target: algebra.bigb
A finite quotient is the image of a group under a surjective group homomorphism to a finite group. A group has no nontrivial finite quotients exactly when every homomorphism from it to a finite group is trivial. This property does not prohibit finite or finite-quotient-bearing subgroups.
An abelian quotient is a quotient group that is an abelian group. It exists only for a normal subgroup , and it is abelian exactly when contains the commutator subgroup. Thus every abelian quotient factors through the abelianization .
Articles by others on the same topic
In group theory, a **quotient group** (or factor group) is a way of constructing a new group from an existing group by partitioning it into disjoint subsets, called cosets, that are determined by a normal subgroup. Here's how it works, step by step: 1. **Group**: Let \( G \) be a group, which is a set equipped with a binary operation satisfying the group axioms (closure, associativity, identity element, and inverses).
Ultimate explanation: math.stackexchange.com/questions/776039/intuition-behind-normal-subgroups/3732426#3732426
Does not have to be isomorphic to a subgroup:
This is one of the reasons why the analogy between simple groups of finite groups and prime numbers is limited.
