Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 25 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write for the Chebyshev theta function and for the Second Chebyshev function, where is the Von Mangoldt function. We first establish the Chebyshev estimate. Every prime divides the central binomial coefficient , soApply this at successive powers of two and use monotonicity to obtain . Sincethe terms contribute and therefore . This Chebyshev estimate from central binomial coefficients is all the information about the distribution of primes needed here.
The Von Mangoldt divisor identity gives the factorial proof of Mertens first theorem. With , interchange the finite sums to obtainComparison of with gives . Dividing the preceding identity by , using and the Chebyshev estimate, givesThe contribution of higher prime powers is bounded independently of , becauseThus the Mertens first theorem is
For the square-root logarithmic sum over primes, apply partial summation to with weight . The lower endpoint is understood as , soThe main terms are and . The bounded error in produces a bounded integral, since . ThereforeNeither argument uses the Prime number theorem.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 22 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write for the Chebyshev theta function and for the Second Chebyshev function. Throughout, denotes a prime and all logarithms are natural. Each prime divides the central binomial coefficient, soApply this at and telescope: . Bounding a general by the next power of two proves . Splitting the prime-counting function at now givesThis is the required Chebyshev estimate from central binomial coefficients, with no use of a prime asymptotic.
The higher prime powers also satisfyFor an integer , the prime factorization of a factorial givesThe Stirling formula, or integral comparison for , says . After division by we obtain . MoreoverSubtract this bounded contribution and replace by . The factorial proof of Mertens first theorem therefore yields
For fixed , apply partial summation to and :The main contribution isThe bounded error in contributes at the endpoint and in the integral, since . Thus the positive logarithmic moments of reciprocal primes satisfy
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 28 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write and for the two Chebyshev functions, and for the prime-counting function. If , the prime divides the central binomial coefficient . ConsequentlySum this inequality over dyadic integers . It gives . Monotonicity, with , gives for real . This is the Chebyshev estimate from central binomial coefficients; no information about the distribution of primes beyond unique factorization has been used.
Split the primes at . For , , soSince ,We also need . The contributions of higher prime powers satisfybecause only contribute, and for .
The Von Mangoldt divisor identity is , which follows by factoring into prime powers. Summing it for , with a positive integer, givesThe bound already proved makes the last error . Integral comparison for , or the Stirling formula, gives . ThereforeThe contribution from higher prime powers is uniformly bounded:Subtract it, and replace by , to obtain the Mertens first theorem
Now fix . Apply partial summation to and . With the lower endpoint interpreted as , so that the prime is included, this givesThe boundary term tends to zero, and the integral converges, since and . Thus the series converges for every positive . Keeping the main term of also gives the useful logarithmically weighted reciprocal-prime tailIndeed, subtract the finite partial sum from the limiting integral: the boundary contributes and the main integral contributes .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 8 4 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Use the Chebyshev estimate from central binomial coefficients. DefineThe first is the Chebyshev theta function; the second counts prime powers with the same logarithmic prime weight. For a positive integer , every prime divides , henceSumming over dyadic intervals yields . By monotonicity and rounding upward to a power of two,
For the lower bound, the central binomial coefficient is the largest of the coefficients whose sum is , soThe exponent of a prime in the central coefficient isEach summand is zero or one. Therefore . Higher prime powers contribute onlyCombining the lower bound with just below shows for sufficiently large , with, for example, .
Let denote the number of primes at most . Since every prime weight is at most ,For the upper bound, separate the primes at . The small ones number at most , and every larger one has weight at least , givingSince , this provesfor all sufficiently large , for instance with and . This elementary Chebyshev estimate does not assume the Prime number theorem.