Write for the Chebyshev theta function and for the Second Chebyshev function, where is the Von Mangoldt function. We first establish the Chebyshev estimate. Every prime divides the central binomial coefficient , so
Apply this at successive powers of two and use monotonicity to obtain . Since
the terms contribute and therefore . This Chebyshev estimate from central binomial coefficients is all the information about the distribution of primes needed here.
The Von Mangoldt divisor identity gives the factorial proof of Mertens first theorem. With , interchange the finite sums to obtain
Comparison of with gives . Dividing the preceding identity by , using and the Chebyshev estimate, gives
The contribution of higher prime powers is bounded independently of , because
Thus the Mertens first theorem is
For the square-root logarithmic sum over primes, apply partial summation to with weight . The lower endpoint is understood as , so
The main terms are and . The bounded error in produces a bounded integral, since . Therefore
Neither argument uses the Prime number theorem.
Write for the Chebyshev theta function and for the Second Chebyshev function. Throughout, denotes a prime and all logarithms are natural. Each prime divides the central binomial coefficient, so
Apply this at and telescope: . Bounding a general by the next power of two proves . Splitting the prime-counting function at now gives
This is the required Chebyshev estimate from central binomial coefficients, with no use of a prime asymptotic.
The higher prime powers also satisfy
For an integer , the prime factorization of a factorial gives
The Stirling formula, or integral comparison for , says . After division by we obtain . Moreover
Subtract this bounded contribution and replace by . The factorial proof of Mertens first theorem therefore yields
For fixed , apply partial summation to and :
The main contribution is
The bounded error in contributes at the endpoint and in the integral, since . Thus the positive logarithmic moments of reciprocal primes satisfy
Write and for the two Chebyshev functions, and for the prime-counting function. If , the prime divides the central binomial coefficient . Consequently
Sum this inequality over dyadic integers . It gives . Monotonicity, with , gives for real . This is the Chebyshev estimate from central binomial coefficients; no information about the distribution of primes beyond unique factorization has been used.
Split the primes at . For , , so
Since ,
We also need . The contributions of higher prime powers satisfy
because only contribute, and for .
The Von Mangoldt divisor identity is , which follows by factoring into prime powers. Summing it for , with a positive integer, gives
The bound already proved makes the last error . Integral comparison for , or the Stirling formula, gives . Therefore
The contribution from higher prime powers is uniformly bounded:
Subtract it, and replace by , to obtain the Mertens first theorem
Now fix . Apply partial summation to and . With the lower endpoint interpreted as , so that the prime is included, this gives
The boundary term tends to zero, and the integral converges, since and . Thus the series converges for every positive . Keeping the main term of also gives the useful logarithmically weighted reciprocal-prime tail
Indeed, subtract the finite partial sum from the limiting integral: the boundary contributes and the main integral contributes .
Use the Chebyshev estimate from central binomial coefficients. Define
The first is the Chebyshev theta function; the second counts prime powers with the same logarithmic prime weight. For a positive integer , every prime divides , hence
Summing over dyadic intervals yields . By monotonicity and rounding upward to a power of two,
For the lower bound, the central binomial coefficient is the largest of the coefficients whose sum is , so
The exponent of a prime in the central coefficient is
Each summand is zero or one. Therefore . Higher prime powers contribute only
Combining the lower bound with just below shows for sufficiently large , with, for example, .
Let denote the number of primes at most . Since every prime weight is at most ,
For the upper bound, separate the primes at . The small ones number at most , and every larger one has weight at least , giving
Since , this proves
for all sufficiently large , for instance with and . This elementary Chebyshev estimate does not assume the Prime number theorem.