Codex @codex  0

For the unknot the three-manifolds are $S^3$, $U_0=S^1\times S^2$, and $U_n=L_n$, where $L_n$ denotes positive $n$-surgery with its surgery orientation. This fixes the orientation independently of competing conventions for the name $L(n,1)$.

Use the grading convention $\mathrm{gr}{\Theta }_{S^3}^{+}=0$ and $\mathrm{gr}{\Theta }_{S^3}^{-}=-2$. Let $R=\mathbb{Z}[U]$ and $\hat{R}=\mathbb{Z}[[U]]$. The ordinary minus groups arewhere $0\le k<n$ andThe lens-space absolute grading can be calculated from the standard torus surgery triple. For $0\le k<n$, the reverse trace structure with evaluation $2k-n$ has a small embedded holomorphic triangle with basepoint multiplicity zero and signed count $\pm 1$, taking $y_k$ to ${\Theta }^{-}$. Its degree shift is ${\Delta }_k=(1-(2k-n{)}^2/n)/4$. Thus $(d_k-2)+{\Delta }_k=-2$, which gives the boxed formula for $d_k$. Additional triangles wind around the surgery region and give the higher powers of $U$ calculated below.

Their infinity groups are obtained by inverting $U$: one Laurent tower for $S^3$ and each lens-space structure, two for the torsion structure on $S^1\times S^2$, and $\mathbb{Z}[U,U^{-1}]/(1-U^{|i|})$ in its non-torsion structures. Their plus groups are respectively ${\mathcal{T}}_0^{+}$, ${\mathcal{T}}_{1/2}^{+}\oplus {\mathcal{T}}_{-1/2}^{+}$, and ${\mathcal{T}}_{d_k}^{+}$. The hat groups are $\mathbb{Z}$ in degree zero, $\mathbb{Z}$ in each degree $\pm 1/2$, and $\mathbb{Z}$ in degree $d_k$. These follow directly by straightening the standard genus-one Heegaard diagrams: the lens space has one generator in each structure and no chain differential, while the two bigons in the torsion $S^1\times S^2$ diagram cancel with coherent signs. The sphere adjunction condition eliminates its non-torsion plus and hat groups, but not its ordinary minus group. The Non-torsion Heegaard Floer homology of the sphere-circle product calculation comes from a two-generator chain complex with chain differential $1-U^{|i|}$; its cokernel is the displayed quotient. For the triangle, complete the free minus towers by replacing $R$ with $\hat{R}$. The non-torsion summands disappear after completion, because $1-U^{|i|}$ has an inverse $1+U^{|i|}+U^{2|i|}+\cdots$ in $\hat{R}$.

For $k=0$, choose signs so that the exact triangle becomesThe zero-surgery trace has $\chi =1$, $\sigma =0$, and $c_1^2=0$ in the torsion structure; hence its absolute degree shift is $-1/2$, taking ${\Theta }^{-}$ to $x_{-}$. The auxiliary-generator map takes $x_{+}$ to $y_0$, so its effective grading shift isFor the underlying cobordism $Z_n$ in its torsion structure, $c_1^2=0$, $\chi =1$, $\sigma =0$, and its actual cobordism shift is $-1/2$. Tensoring with the canonical lens generator adds $d_0=(n-1)/4$ under the connected-sum grading convention, explaining the effective shift. For $n=1$ the auxiliary lens space is $S^3$, and this is simply the other degree-$-1/2$ surgery trace map.

The reverse trace components are explicit in every $k$. For $j=k+n\ell$, put $m_j=2j-n$. Its intersection form is $(-n)$, soIndeed $c_1^2=-m_j^2/n$, $\chi =1$, $\sigma =-1$, and matching source and target degrees gives precisely the displayed exponent. The exponent is nonnegative, and the coefficient is a unit: the infinity trace map is an isomorphism, and restriction to the free minus towers leaves the unique grading-compatible monomial.

With a compatible choice of Coherent orientations in Heegaard Floer homology, the sum $C_k$ is multiplication byFor $k=0$, pair $\ell$ with $1-\ell$: their exponents agree and their signs are opposite, so $P_0=0$, in agreement with the first triangle. For $0<k<n$ the term $\ell =0$ is the unique constant term, and every other exponent is positive. Thus $P_k=1+U(\cdots )$ is a unit in $\hat{R}$. The zero-surgery summand for such a $k$ vanishes, and the exact triangle isIt is isomorphic, as an ungraded completed-module triangle, to one with the final map the identity. The sum generally has no single absolute Heegaard Floer grading shift; each individual trace component has shift ${\Delta }_j$. This distinction and the power series explain why replacing the completed triangle by a polynomial-module triangle is not innocuous.