= Daniel Zimprich
{c}
<Daniel Zimprich> contributed to methodological debate about measuring <interoception> with the <heartbeat counting task>. His analysis examines how the construction of an accuracy score can affect statistical relationships involving that score. The contribution distinguishes criticism of a scoring rule from a demonstration that a participant actually detected individual heartbeats, connecting measurement design to interpretation of a psychological attribute. <Are interoceptive accuracy scores from the heartbeat counting task problematic? A comment on Zamariola et al. (2018) by Daniel Zimprich and others>[2020, ratio-score interpretation and statistical critique]{ref}
Back to article page
