Daniel Zimprich contributed to methodological debate about measuring interoception with the heartbeat counting task. His analysis examines how the construction of an accuracy score can affect statistical relationships involving that score. The contribution distinguishes criticism of a scoring rule from a demonstration that a participant actually detected individual heartbeats, connecting measurement design to interpretation of a psychological attribute. [ref]
Are interoceptive accuracy scores from the heartbeat counting task problematic? A comment on Zamariola et al. (2018) by Daniel Zimprich and others. 2020, ratio-score interpretation and statistical critique
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.