For a simple predictable process, define its stochastic integral by
Common refinement of the deterministic partitions makes this definition independent of the representation. Each summand is a martingale increment multiplied by information already available at its left endpoint, so the resulting process is a continuous square-integrable martingale starting at zero. Its terminal value is the same sum with replaced by .
Write . If , then is -measurable. By the conditional expectation identity for increments of a martingale,
The conditional bracket isometry for stopped martingale increments gives
For completeness, this identity follows by applying the optional stopping theorem to and and expanding the square. The latter process is a true uniformly integrable martingale here: the Doob L2 maximal inequality bounds , stopped square identities and Fatou's lemma give , and its absolute supremum is bounded by . Consequently all the stopped identities pass to the limit.
Multiplying the conditional identity by , taking expectations, and using the vanished cross terms proves the Itô isometry:
To extend the stochastic integral, use the finite quadratic-variation measure on the predictable sigma-algebra. The density of simple predictable processes for finite measures gives approximations to every . The Itô isometry makes the corresponding terminal integrals Cauchy in , and the Doob L2 maximal inequality makes the whole processes Cauchy in expected squared supremum. Their limit defines a continuous martingale, and the isometry persists. For a locally bounded predictable process, choose increasing stopping times tending to infinity on which it is bounded, also restrict the time horizon, and perform this construction after stopping. The isometry shows that the stopped definitions agree on overlaps, so they patch into a uniquely defined continuous local martingale .
A simple predictable process can be written
where each is bounded and -measurable. Define its integral to start at zero:
Refining the partition leaves this sum unchanged. Every summand is a martingale, by conditioning its future increment on the information at . Bounded coefficients and the bound on make the integral an L2-bounded continuous martingale. Its terminal value is the same sum with substituted at any infinite endpoint; martingale convergence supplies this limit.
We need the conditional square identity, rather than assuming independent increments. The Doob L2 maximal inequality gives . Localize the square identity for at level and bracket stopping times. The stopped identity and this maximal bound give by monotone convergence. Now
is integrable, so localization passes to conditional expectations and is a uniformly integrable martingale. Expanding a squared increment and using proves
The infinite endpoint follows from convergence and integrability of the bracket. The initial value need not be zero: the integral itself is zero-starting.
In the square of the terminal integral, all cross terms vanish. For , the th increment and both coefficients in its cross term are measurable at , whereas the conditional mean of the th increment there is zero. For the diagonal terms, the preceding conditional identity can be multiplied by the bounded . Therefore
This proves the Itô isometry for these simple integrands. Ordered stopping-time intervals also work, replacing the conditional identity by optional stopping theorem, but deterministic intervals suffice for the approximation requested here.
For that approximation, put on the predictable sigma-algebra. This is a finite measure. That sigma-algebra is generated, apart from the zero-time slice of measure zero, by rectangles with . The indicator of every such rectangle is a bounded simple predictable process.
Here is a density proof. Let be the closed linear span of these indicators in , and let contain the predictable sets whose indicators belong to . The whole space belongs to ; complements stay in ; and disjoint countable unions do also, because their finite partial indicator sums converge in under the finite measure. Thus is a Dynkin system containing the generating rectangle pi-system. The Pi-lambda theorem makes it the entire predictable sigma-algebra. Bounded predictable simple functions therefore belong to . Truncating any function and then approximating its truncated range by finitely many levels shows that every such function belongs to . A finite sum of rectangle indicators can be rewritten on one common deterministic time partition, with the coefficient on each interval measurable at its left endpoint; it is exactly an allowed simple process.
Consequently choose of this form with . This proves
It is density of simple predictable processes for finite measures, with a proof of the actual approximation step.
Finally apply the preceding isometry to , whose bracket is . The elementary integrals satisfy
Define the Itô integral as the limit of these elementary integrals. The same identity shows independence of the approximating sequence, linearity, mean zero, and . Applying the Doob inequality to the difference processes also gives uniform-in-time convergence on , with a continuous martingale version of the integral.
Let be the closure of the simple predictable processes in the Hilbert space . Common refinement of deterministic partitions makes these processes a vector space. To prove density of simple predictable processes for finite measures, suppose . Since is a finite measure, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives , so
defines a finite signed measure. The indicator of each predictable generating rectangle, including each time-zero rectangle, is a simple predictable process; hence vanishes on these rectangles.
Finite intersections of the rectangles are again rectangles or empty. Add the whole space to this pi-system. Its -mass is zero because is simple and converges to in by the dominated convergence theorem. The zero sets of form a lambda-system now that its total mass is zero. The Pi-lambda theorem therefore gives for every . Taking the sets where and gives -almost everywhere.
Thus and the orthogonal complement criterion for a closed subspace of a Hilbert space yields
Omitting the time-zero term would make this conclusion false when is concentrated at time zero.