With the mode normalization given, the oscillator canonical commutation relations are , with the other two commutators zero. Let and . The convention compatible with the requested numerator is
without an additional factor of outside the vacuum expectation value. Put and . The Fock vacuum is annihilated by , so only contributes to the two Wightman functions. Consequently,
In the second term we changed to give the same spatial exponential.
Now perform the energy contour integral
Here the residue step uses ; the massless zero-momentum point is interpreted through the smeared distribution limit, not as an isolated normalized oscillator. The Feynman i-epsilon prescription puts the positive-energy pole below the real axis and the negative-energy pole above it: and . For , close in the lower half-plane, clockwise; the residue theorem gives times the residue , hence . For , close in the upper half-plane, counterclockwise; the negative-energy residue is , again giving a positive . These are exactly the two time-ordered terms. Restoring the spatial integral proves the scalar Feynman propagator pole prescription:
The prescription in this formula supplies the pole convention left unspecified in the printed display; an unprescribed ordinary real-axis integral would not be well-defined. It is a distribution limit after smearing, not an absolutely convergent four-dimensional integral. With this normalization the derivative jump of a free scalar time-ordered two-point function gives , an independent check of both the numerator and the sign.
The pole displacement is exaggerated in this original schematic. The contour orientation and selected pole reproduce the time ordering of the Feynman propagator.