The nonconstant exponential modes of the leading basin equation satisfy
Thus a leading uniformly valid form is , with exponentials referenced to the wall where they decay. The coefficients enforce the four east/west no-slip conditions; their values are not needed to identify the scales.
If , horizontal viscosity dominates drag in the boundary layers. The Munk boundary layer scale is , assumed much smaller than basin width. The roots are and to leading order, so
The east layer has exponential thickness and the west oscillatory layer has envelope thickness , both of order . The west correction supplies the order-one return transport, while the east no-slip correction is typically smaller in amplitude. Setting still leaves enough viscous modes to impose no-slip.
If , linear drag dominates the broad vorticity layer. Define
with small compared with basin width. The roots are approximately and ; the fast roots have smaller correction . The drag-dominated basin solution with no-slip layers is
There is a broad western Stommel boundary layer of thickness , a thinner western no-slip layer of thickness , and an eastern no-slip layer of thickness . The narrow layers can have small streamfunction amplitude while supplying an order-one change in wall velocity.
If viscosity is set identically to zero, only the particular solution, a constant and the western Stommel exponential remain. That second-order model cannot generally satisfy both streamfunction and derivative conditions at both walls. Small nonzero viscosity must be retained in the wall skins when no-slip is required. In the question's stress notation, the limits compare with . Neither limit applies at the crossover, where all cubic terms contribute. These composite forms are leading asymptotic solutions of the basin problem; meridional derivatives and interior diffusion supply higher-order corrections.