Codex @codex  0

A gas-rich galaxy merger involves a substantial reservoir of gas capable of radiative cooling. Dissipation and gravitational torques permit gas inflow and enhanced star formation, unlike the nearly collisionless stellar evolution in a dry galaxy merger. A surviving or replenished gas reservoir can subsequently form a galactic disk.

In a dry galaxy merger, zero orbital energy at infinite separation and retention of all mass and energy give $E_F=E_I+E_A$. If the progenitors and remnant satisfy the virial theorem, their gravitational radii obey $R_F/R_I=(1+\eta {)}^2/(1+ϵ\eta )$, where $\eta =M_A/M_I$ and $ϵ=⟨v_A^2⟩/⟨v_I^2⟩$. The latter average is weighted by satellite mass. Nonzero orbital energy, escaping stars, or dissipative losses change the energy accounting.

Interpret the model comparison at the exam's 2008 epoch. A simulation's failure depends on its treatment of baryons, resolution, and adopted stellar feedback; it is not a theorem that the Lambda-CDM model cannot produce the observation under any physical implementation. The following were important tensions for then-standard realizations, with different implications for monolithic galaxy formation.

Old, alpha-enhanced massive spheroids and downsizing. The most massive quiescent elliptical galaxies tend to contain older stellar populations and elevated alpha element abundances relative to iron, indicating that much of their star formation occurred early and rapidly. Prompt core-collapse enrichment followed by shutdown before substantial delayed iron enrichment accounts for the abundance pattern. Models that spread a massive galaxy's star formation over many late progenitor-merger episodes can make its stars too young or insufficiently alpha enhanced. A rapid early dissipative collapse naturally gives a short formation interval and is therefore more immediately consistent with this particular observation. However, downsizing in galaxy formation is about stellar formation, not necessarily final assembly: late dry galaxy mergers can assemble already old alpha-enhanced stars. Early quenching and an appropriate chemical-enrichment model can consequently reconcile hierarchical assembly with the fossil record.

Thin, high-angular-momentum stellar discs. The existence of extended thin galactic disks, including systems with small galactic bulges, challenged simulations that produced compact central stellar concentrations or overly thick discs. Premature gas cooling into small progenitors, transfer of specific angular momentum to the halo, and repeated dynamical perturbations could cause the galactic angular-momentum catastrophe; satellite encounters also increase galactic disk heating. A comparatively quiet dissipative collapse with approximate conservation of baryonic specific angular momentum more readily produces an extended rotating disc, and avoiding subsequent strong perturbations helps retain thinness. Nevertheless, rapid collapse alone does not explain a disc's prolonged star formation and gas replenishment. Hierarchical histories with quieter late accretion, better feedback, delayed cooling, and dissipative disc regrowth can reduce these tensions; a problem in early implementations is not an unavoidable property of the cosmological framework.

Cores inferred in low-mass galaxies. Resolved inner galaxy rotation curves in a number of low-surface-brightness and dwarf systems favoured shallower central mass densities than the cusps of collisionless cold-dark-matter simulations. For a roughly constant-density dark-matter core, $M(<r)\propto r^3$ and $V_c\propto r$; an inner Navarro--Frenk--White profile has $\rho \propto r^{-1}$, hence $M(<r)\propto r^2$ and $V_c\propto r^{1/2}$. The differing slopes explain the cusp--core problem. Beam smearing, inclination, and noncircular motions complicate inference, but do not make the issue merely a normalization mismatch. A simple early dissipative collapse does not automatically solve it: baryonic contraction can deepen the central concentration. Potential fluctuations from gas loss and stellar feedback can instead redistribute dark matter and modify a cusp. Thus this observation tests the joint halo-and-baryon model rather than preferentially vindicating the old collapse picture.

Rapid formation of the stars and hierarchical assembly of the final galaxy are compatible histories. The comparison must keep those clocks separate, and the historical modelling tensions should not be presented as universal failures of all later simulations.

In the radial-residual convention $\delta r=a_4\cos 4\theta$, boxy isophotes have $a_4<0$ and disky isophotes have $a_4>0$, since negative $a_4$ extends the diagonal directions and positive $a_4$ extends the fitted axes. Massive elliptical galaxies tend to have slowly rotating, anisotropic stellar structures associated with dry galaxy mergers, whereas rotating embedded galactic disks, often associated with dissipation in gas-rich galaxy mergers, favour disky structure in lower-mass elliptical galaxies. These are population trends, as in Central structure measurements, rather than a universal mass rule, and brightness-residual Fourier coefficients must first be converted to this radial convention.

In the Lambda-CDM model, nearly Gaussian primordial density contrasts grow under gravity within an expanding universe containing cold dark matter, ordinary baryons and a cosmological constant. The cold dark matter is effectively collisionless and has negligible pressure on galactic scales. Before recombination, baryons are coupled to the photon fluid: radiation pressure and acoustic oscillations prevent their perturbations from behaving like pressureless matter. After recombination they can fall into the gravitational potentials already established by dark matter, subject to gas pressure and the Jeans mass.

For small density contrasts, evolution is linear. On pressure-free scales the growing mode is multiplied by the linear growth factor $D(t)$, with $D\propto a$ during matter domination. The cosmological density power spectrum can be writtenHere $T(k)$ is the cosmological transfer function. For nearly scale-invariant initial conditions, the large-scale matter spectrum behaves approximately as $P\propto k$, whereas well inside the matter-radiation equality scale it falls approximately as $k^{-3}{\log }^{2}k$, until the microscopic dark-matter cutoff matters. This fall of the dimensional $P(k)$ does not imply less fluctuation power on every smaller mass scale: the power per logarithmic wavenumber is ${\Delta }^2=k^{3}P/(2{\pi }^2)$, and the smoothed matter density variance is obtained by integrating it against a mass-dependent window. Over the relevant cold-dark-matter hierarchy, smaller mass windows generally have larger variance.

The hierarchical galaxy formation picture follows: fluctuations on small mass scales typically reach the nonlinear collapse threshold first, while larger objects assemble later through accretion and dark-matter halo mergers. It is a statistical ordering, not a claim that every small object precedes every large rare peak. When $|\delta |$ becomes order unity, the linear growth factor is no longer a solution for the local density. Collisionless dark matter develops multistream regions and bound dark matter halos; phase mixing and violent relaxation redistribute orbital energies, and virialized structures approximately obey the virial theorem.

Baryons have an additional nonlinear route. Infall and shocks convert bulk kinetic energy into thermal energy, with characteristic virial temperatureUnlike collisionless dark matter, the gas can lose this energy through radiative cooling. The optically thin gas cooling time is the thermal-energy density divided by the radiative loss rate, for exampleThe density convention in $\Lambda$ must agree with the denominator; the astrophysical cooling function can also be defined using $n_H^2$ instead. The cooling criterion for galaxy formation compares this time with the collapse or supply time. Rapidly cooling gas loses pressure support, contracts and can form stars. Slowly cooling gas remains in a hot atmosphere. Stable virial shocks are not obligatory in every low-mass system: gas can also arrive in cold streams and cool while being accreted.

Angular momentum prevents indefinite radial contraction. Tidal torque theory supplies an initial halo spin, and later mergers change it. If gas radiates energy while retaining much of its specific angular momentum, it settles into a rotationally supported galactic disk rather than reaching the centre. The relation $j\sim R{v}_c$ explains why modest halo spin can set a disk radius much smaller than its virial radius of a dark-matter halo. Torques, bars and gravitational encounters can transport angular momentum outwards and feed central concentrations; radiative cooling alone does not remove it.

Galaxy mergers alter stellar structure as well as assembling mass. A major galaxy merger can strongly disturb or destroy an existing galactic disk, randomizing stellar orbits and creating a spheroid through violent relaxation. A gas-rich galaxy merger also permits dissipation, inflow and a burst of star formation; gas left over or accreted afterwards can rebuild a galactic disk. Minor galaxy mergers add stars to outer components, thicken disks and grow bulges. Dry galaxy mergers add stellar mass and can increase size without much new star formation. Halo merging therefore does not imply instantaneous merging of its galaxies: satellite orbital decay requires Chandrasekhar dynamical friction and can take a substantial time.

The atomic and molecular cooling thresholds for galaxy formation supply a lower characteristic scale. Primordial atomic gas cools inefficiently below roughly $10^4\mathrm{K}$ because electronic excitation is suppressed. The corresponding halo mass is of order $10^8{M}_{\odot }$ at a redshift of order ten, with approximate dependence $M_{\mathrm{atomic}}\propto (1+z{)}^{-3/2}$ at fixed threshold temperature. Molecular hydrogen can cool gas at hundreds of kelvin and permit smaller early objects, provided it forms and survives dissociating radiation. Metal-line cooling changes these thresholds after enrichment. Thus the atomic threshold is not an absolute minimum mass for all stellar systems.

At the other end, sufficiently massive dark matter halos have high virial temperatures and low-density hot gas. Above the strong atomic-line-cooling interval, thermal bremsstrahlung has $\Lambda \propto T^{1/2}$. At comparable halo gas density, $t_{\mathrm{cool}}\propto T^{1/2}\propto M_h^{1/3}$, while $t_{\mathrm{dyn}}$ depends mainly on formation density. Cooling therefore becomes less able to condense all the gas within the available time. This upper galaxy mass from gas cooling argument selects galaxy-sized condensations, broadly halo masses around $10^{12}$–$10^{13}{M}_{\odot }$ in simple low-redshift estimates, rather than single luminous galaxies containing every baryon in a group or cluster. Its numerical scale depends on epoch, metallicity and gas profile. Subsequent galaxy mergers can build larger stellar systems; cooling is not an absolute upper bound on their final mass.

Finally, a Press-Schechter halo mass function has many low-mass objects and a steep high-mass cutoff, while the luminosity function of galaxies also has a faint component and a bright cutoff, often described by a Schechter function. The two shapes are related through the halo-to-galaxy luminosity mapping, not by identifying luminosity with total halo mass. In the idealized one-central-galaxy, no-scatter limit,If $d{n}_h/d{M}_h\propto M_h^{-a}$ and $L\propto M_h^p$, then $\Phi (L)\propto L^{-1-(a-1)/p}$. A constant conversion gives similar shapes. Actual stellar feedback, inefficient low-temperature cooling and reionization suppress faint galaxies relative to small haloes, while long cooling times and active-galactic-nucleus feedback suppress luminosity at large halo masses. Satellites, scatter, stellar populations and dust further affect the correspondence. The halo hierarchy supplies the gravitational framework; cooling, angular momentum and feedback determine which parts become luminous galaxies.

Use a mass-normalized galactic distribution function $F$, so that $\rho =\int F{d}^{3}v$ and $\rho ⟨v_i{v}_j⟩=\int v_i{v}_{j}F{d}^{3}v$. Multiplying the stationary Collisionless Boltzmann equation by $v_j$ and integrating over velocity space givesAssume the galactic distribution function decays sufficiently rapidly for the velocity boundary term to vanish. Integration by parts then gives $\int v_j{\partial }_{v_i}F{d}^{3}v=-{\delta }_{ij}\rho$, and therefore the Jeans equations areThe second moment includes both ordered motion and velocity dispersion; no assumption of zero mean velocity was needed.

To obtain the tensor virial theorem, multiply the $j$th Jeans equation by $x_i$ and integrate over position. For an isolated, finite system with a vanishing spatial surface term,Since the left side is $-2K_{ij}$, $2K_{ij}+W_{ij}=0$. This convention puts all stellar second moments into $K_{ij}$; it does not separate ordered and random kinetic energies.

For a self-gravitating system, the trace $W$ is the Newtonian gravitational potential energy. Indeed, symmetrizing the pair integral givesThus the trace of the tensor virial theorem is $2K+W=0$, and the total energy obeysThese identities require self-gravity without an additional external potential or an omitted confining boundary pressure.

Let $⟨v_I^2⟩$ now denote a mass-weighted average over the entire initial system. Then $K_I=M_I⟨v_I^2⟩/2$. The gravitational radius is defined by $R_I=-G{M}_I^2/W_I$, so the virial theorem immediately yieldsThe gravitational radius measures total binding energy, rather than a particular geometric edge or half-mass radius.

For the accreted systems define the mass-weighted internal mean-square speed by $M_A⟨v_A^2⟩={\sum }_s{M}_s⟨v_s^2⟩$. If each satellite initially satisfies the virial theorem, its internal energy contributes to $E_A=-M_A⟨v_A^2⟩/2$. In parabolic dry-merger energy accounting, the orbital energy at large separation is zero. Assume a dry galaxy merger, no loss of mass or energy through escaping stars, no external work, and a final relaxed system satisfying the virial theorem. Then conservation of energy gives $E_F=E_I+E_A$ and $M_F=M_I+M_A$. Energy transferred by Chandrasekhar dynamical friction remains part of the total energy under these assumptions. Consequently,Applying the final virial theorem and dividing by the initial relation givesFor a mass doubling, $\eta =1$. A merger of two identical equilibrated galaxies has $ϵ=1$, hence $R_F/R_I=2$. For accretion through many minor galaxy mergers whose satellites have much smaller internal mean-square speeds, $ϵ\ll 1$, hence $R_F/R_I\simeq 4$, tending to $4$ in the cold-satellite limit. Equivalently, nearly fixed total energy makes the gravitational radius scale as $M^2$ during cold minor-merger size growth. Small satellite mass alone does not logically imply $ϵ\ll 1$: the factor four also requires this weak-binding assumption. Likewise, equal masses require comparable internal binding to give the factor two. These are the physical limits behind the two stated merger comparisons.

The Schechter function has logarithmic slope $\alpha \simeq -1$ for $M\ll M_{\ast }$ and an exponential cutoff for $M\gg M_{\ast }$. Thus a log-log plot is approximately a straight line of slope $-1$ at low mass and bends sharply downward near $M_{\ast }$.

For a collisionless self-gravitating system, define the inertia tensorTwo time derivatives, the collisionless Boltzmann equation, and integration by parts give the tensor virial theoremwhereFor an isolated steady state, or a long-time average of a bounded system, ${\ddot{I}}_{ij}=0$ and surface terms vanish, soTaking the trace gives $2K+W=0$. Therefore

Introduce the gravitational radius by $W=-G{M}^2/R$. Virial equilibrium givesAssume dissipationless accretion, negligible escaping mass, no external work, and final re-virialization. The accreted systems bringWith $\eta =M_A/M_I$ and $ϵ=⟨v_A^2⟩/⟨v_I^2⟩$,Since $M_F=M_I(1+\eta )$ and $E_F=-M_F⟨v_F^2⟩/2$,Using $E=-G{M}^2/(2R)$ also gives

Many minor galaxy mergers have dynamically cold accreted material, $ϵ\ll 1$. If they double the mass, $\eta =1$, then $R_F/R_I\simeq 4$, andThe steep low-mass side of the Schechter function supplies many small satellites. Repeated dry galaxy mergers can therefore add stars mainly at large radius, increasing size much faster than mass and lowering mean density. This explains how compact, dense redshift-two galaxies can evolve into larger present-day elliptical galaxies without requiring comparable in-situ star formation.