The discriminant of the Eady model with a sloping lower boundary is
For any , choose the unique satisfying . Then , proving existence of an unstable band even when . For large negative , resonance occurs at large and the exponentially weak boundary-wave coupling makes the unstable band narrow.
In an adiabatic quasi-geostrophic approximation, hydrostatic approximation and geostrophic balance give . The leading buoyancy equation is ; hence . At the rigid surface , the no-normal-flow condition is , so . The small boundary slope allows the disturbance condition to be evaluated at the flattened boundary to the retained order.
For thermal wind , choose the basic quasi-geostrophic streamfunction . Its buoyancy anomaly is , and its interior quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity is constant. Therefore the linear disturbance equations are
The term is the advection of the basic meridional buoyancy gradient. Since is simply advected at each fixed height, initially implies forever. At the lower boundary define ; then
The PDF uses for the lower-boundary slope throughout; the TeX's isolated is a transcription error.
For nonzero zonal wavenumber let . The zero-interior-potential vorticity condition gives . In the semi-infinite domain choose decay as . Writing , potential-vorticity inversion then gives
This sloping-boundary Eady edge wave has all its time dependence in the boundary buoyancy equation; the interior responds instantaneously through elliptic potential-vorticity inversion. A single boundary wave oscillates without exponential growth. Vertical shear and topography contribute oppositely to its propagation. The contributions cancel when , the slope of a background isopycnal. For , positive without slope gives eastward propagation, while a positive slope without shear gives westward propagation. The phase velocity varies as , and the trapping depth is . Its frequency is independent of on each signed branch, so its zonal group velocity is zero in this ideal semi-infinite model.
With a rigid horizontal upper boundary, put and . Solving the same second-order inversion problem with both derivative data gives
Differentiation at and checks the prescribed values. At the upper boundary , so . Combining this with the lower-boundary condition gives
Thus two Boundary Rossby waves interact across the layer. For normal modes proportional to their dimensional wave-speed matrix is
For , define and . Its characteristic polynomial is the Eady model with a sloping lower boundary dispersion relation
The source writes ; for this is , and the dispersion relation is unchanged by replacing that signed quantity by its absolute value. Its two roots are
If , the second term is positive, so for every : all modes are spectrally stable. If , the increasing function runs from zero to infinity, so there is a unique with
There the squared term is zero and , giving an exponentially growing member of the complex conjugate pair. By continuity it lies in an unstable band. This proves both the requested instability for and instability for negative slopes in the sloping-boundary Eady model. It does not assert that every wavelength is unstable. Strongly negative slopes move the resonant band to large , where the coupling is exponentially weak.
At the speeds are real, but their crossing at can give a defective neutral mode and algebraic growth; absence of exponential instability is weaker than boundedness of every initial disturbance. The nondimensional slope is undefined when ; the dimensional matrix remains valid and then has two real speeds. The instability for is the counterpropagating wave instability mechanism: lower and upper boundary waves can match their laboratory phase speeds and exchange energy with the vertical shear.