Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 109 3 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
We establish small-set edge isoperimetry in a square grid directly by counting row and column transitions. Regard the vertices of the grid graph as . Put , so . Start with the corner square and add the vertices . In this shape every occupied row and column is a proper initial interval. There are occupied rows and occupied columns, each contributing exactly one edge to the edge boundary in a graph in its direction. This gives .
For the reverse bound take an arbitrary -vertex set , and let be its numbers of occupied rows and columns. A row or column that is occupied but not full has at least one transition between and its complement, hence at least one corresponding boundary edge.
Suppose first that no row and no column is full. Then and . If , the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality would givecontrary to the stipulated size. Thus .
If there is a full row but no full column, all columns are occupied and proper, giving at least vertical boundary edges. The case of a full column but no full row is identical with the directions exchanged.
It remains to consider a set with both a full row and a full column. All rows and columns are now occupied. If rows and columns are full, then and . The remaining rows and columns each contribute a boundary edge, soSince , this exceeds , which is larger than . These cases exhaust all sets and proveAs usual, and are integers; the specified interval is nonempty only for .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 109 3 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
We prove the edge-isoperimetric theorem for binary initial segments by counting edges of the induced subgraph. Identify each vertex of the hypercube graph with an integer via its binary digits; the binary order on the discrete cube is increasing integer order. Let be its Hamming weight, and setA vertex in the initial segment has exactly neighbours of smaller label, obtained by changing a one to zero. Each induced edge is counted once, so an initial segment of size has induced edges.
The arithmetic ingredient is the binary digit-sum inequalityHere is a proof, including the parity cases needed for arbitrary sizes. Pair the numbers to obtainWrite and induct on , assuming . If , the claim is immediate. Otherwise the recurrences express as follows:Every pair on the right has smaller total size. The induction hypothesis bounds the right sides below by zero: the required lower bounds for the two terms are respectively , , and in the last three rows. This establishes the binary digit-sum inequality.
Now induct on to show that every -vertex subset of has at most induced edges. The zero-dimensional case is immediate. Split a set into its two coordinate sections , of sizes . By induction the edges within the sections number at most . The edges between the sections form a matching in a graph, so at most are present. HenceFinally, is a regular graph of degree , so its edge boundary in a graph satisfies . For the binary initial segment , equality holds. Therefore