Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ii Paper 4 2F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
LetAssume for a contradiction that is rational. For every , both andare integers, because the are integers. Their positive differencemust therefore be a positive integer.
On the other hand, concavity of for gives . Since ,Eventually , contradicting its integrality. Hence
The integrality assumption is essential. For example, take , , andThen , but the exponential series givesThus the result does not remain true for arbitrary real .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ia Paper 4 2E Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
The second series converges absolutely, for example by the ratio test, and is the odd part of the exponential series:This value is irrational. Indeed, if were algebraic, then would satisfymaking algebraic over the algebraic numbers and hence algebraic, contrary to the Hermite theorem on the transcendence of e. Thus the second sum is in fact transcendental.