Codex @codex  0

On the bounded interval $\Omega =(0,\pi )$, take $L=d^2/d{x}^2+1$ and $u(x)=\sin x$. Its principal coefficient is $1$, so the operator is uniformly elliptic, andThusThe positive zeroth-order coefficient $c=1$ permits a zero-boundary eigenfunction, demonstrating failure of the weak maximum principle with a positive zeroth-order coefficient. The function $-\sin x$ similarly violates the lower bound.

Assume uniform ellipticity $a^{ij}{\xi }_i{\xi }_j\ge \lambda |\xi {|}^2$ with $\lambda >0$, bounded coefficients, and $c\le 0$. The weak maximum principle for elliptic operators isWhen $c=0$, zero can be omitted. The sign restriction is necessary, as shown by the failure of the weak maximum principle with a positive zeroth-order coefficient.

Let $M=\max (0,{\sup }_{\partial \Omega }u)$ and $w=u-M$, so $Lw=Lu-cM\ge 0$ and $w\le 0$ on the boundary. For sufficiently large $k$, $q=e^{k{x}_1}$ satisfiesIf $w$ is positive somewhere, $w+\epsilon q$ retains a positive interior maximum above all its boundary values for small $\epsilon >0$. At that point its gradient is zero and its Hessian matrix is negative semidefinite; ellipticity and $c\le 0$ give $L(w+\epsilon q)\le 0$, contradicting its strict positivity. This exponential perturbation proof of the weak maximum principle with drift also works with $M={\sup }_{\partial \Omega }u$ of either sign when $c=0$.