Feeding latency is the elapsed time from a defined starting event to a defined feeding event. An experiment might measure from food presentation to an individual's first peck or to the first bird feeding in a social group. Those endpoints answer different questions. The start, the feeding criterion and the observation limit must all be specified.
In an original example, an animal feeds after without a novel object and with one nearby: the novelty-associated increase is . Another changes from to , an increase of . Comparing only the two novel-condition times reverses the ordering obtained by comparing their changes.
A group-level first-feeding time is , if denotes each member's time under that same group trial. This identity requires no independence assumption. It also shows why a group endpoint cannot be treated as though it were a measurement of every member: one early feeder determines the recorded minimum.
If recording ends after before feeding occurs, the observation is subject to right censoring: the time exceeds the recorded limit. Replacing it by an observed time of exactly , or by infinity, changes what was measured.
A finch study combined whether groups fed at all with feeding latency comparisons in familiar and novel-object conditions. Keeping those outcomes separate preserves information that an average of observed feeding times alone could lose.[ref]
Effects of domestication on neophobia: A comparison between the domesticated Bengalese finch and its wild ancestor, the white-rumped munia by Kenta Suzuki and others. Abstract and Results: feeding occurrence and latency under novel-object conditions
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.