Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 48 2 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a bosonic quadratic action , completing the square in the generating functional gives . Two functional derivatives therefore give the Feynman propagator , with boundary conditions and a pole prescription included in the inverse. Zero modes must be removed or fixed before an inverse exists.
Take Minkowski metric , Fourier convention , and the Yang-Mills field strength . The interaction terms do not contribute to the quadratic action. Integration by parts in yieldsThe color kernel is diagonal. For , use the projectors and . They obey , , , soMultiplication explicitly gives the identity on both transverse and longitudinal components. Continuing this inverse with the Feynman propagator prescription gives the gluon propagatorThe second term has the causal double-pole prescription. Away from the pole this is the usual . For it becomes the Feynman-gauge adjoint propagator; gives a transverse covariant Landau gauge propagator.
The limit removes gauge fixing and has no finite inverse on the full field space. The longitudinal eigenvalue tends to zero and its inverse diverges. A contraction with conserved external currents kills the longitudinal term, but that does not define a gauge-unfixed Gaussian integral. This massless limit is not the massive-vector unitary-gauge limit: here it exposes the unfixed gauge orbit degeneracy.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 46 4 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Take metric signature and the Fourier transform convention . Introduce an even source for the gauge field and odd sources for the Faddeev-Popov ghost field:At tree level the two-point functions come from the quadratic action. Integrating the gauge kinetic term by parts gives its momentum-space kernelIts inverse follows from transverse and longitudinal projectors: , so . Completing the bosonic Gaussian square gives , with the Feynman i-epsilon prescription in the inverse. Two source derivatives and their insertion factors give the gauge-boson propagator . HenceFor this reduces to the Feynman-gauge adjoint propagator. The longitudinal double pole is understood with the compatible Feynman boundary prescription.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 50 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
For adjoint-valued quantities write . Substituting the infinitesimal transformation into the gauge field strength and using the Jacobi identity givesA useful way to organize the calculation is : the gauge field strength transforms covariantly because the gauge covariant derivative does. Thus by antisymmetry. This proves gauge invariance of the Yang-Mills action.
The Yang-Mills equations are . They determine physical evolution only modulo gauge redundancy: gauge transformations with arbitrary spacetime-dependent parameters take solutions to equivalent solutions. In Hamiltonian mechanics, has no independent quadratic time-derivative term, and the corresponding equation is a Gauss law constraint in gauge theory. A gauge parameter can vanish with its necessary derivatives on the initial slice yet change the later potential energy, so the potential energy itself is not uniquely fixed by initial physical data.
In the uncorrected path integral, integration along gauge orbits overcounts equivalent fields. At the perturbative level the quadratic operator of the kinetic term has gauge zero modes and no inverse, so it does not supply a quantum field theory propagator. Gauge fixing together with the Faddeev-Popov determinant removes this obstruction in the local perturbative construction.
For the odd BRST transformation, products obey the graded Leibniz rule. The adjoint product with Grassmann variables satisfiesIn particular, is not zero, and . The supplied transformations givesince the even covariant derivative obeys . For the ghost,The final equality is the graded Jacobi identity; in components it is the Jacobi identity for contracted with the totally antisymmetric product of three ghosts. Also and . The square of an odd derivation is an even derivation, because its two mixed product terms cancel. Hence on every polynomial in the fields, off shell, without imposing field equations.
Let be the gauge-fixing fermion. Since , . The BRST-exact operator in has zero variation by BRST nilpotence, soTo see the resulting kinetic terms and signs, expand the exact term with :After integration by parts,The auxiliary Nakanishi-Lautrup field can be completed into a square and integrated out, giving the gauge-fixing term for . At , retain as the multiplier enforcing the gauge condition rather than divide by . The Grassmann Gaussian integral gives the determinant of the gauge-condition operator . Field-independent normalizations cancel in the normalized integral; insertions involving can be handled before integration or through its source terms.
At the gauge-fixed quadratic operator is invertible with the usual prescription, and the ghosts have a quadratic kinetic term. The remaining terms are cubic gauge interactions of order , quartic gauge interactions of order , and a ghost-gauge interaction of order . Expanding them and using Wick contractions gives a perturbative expansion for any defined polynomial insertion of the fields. The exponent is the gauge-fixed action , as printed in the PDF; the converted TeX incorrectly substitutes .
At , the free gauge action, up to a boundary term, is . Its Fourier kernel is . With the mostly-plus convention used above, the Feynman-gauge adjoint propagator isThis is consistent with the scalar-line convention in Question 2.
Finally define the odd functional . Then . Differentiating the normalized expectation, including its denominator, givesfor an insertion with no explicit dependence. A physical gauge-invariant insertion is BRST-closed, since its infinitesimal gauge variation vanishes also when the parameter is replaced by . The assumed BRST Ward identity gives and . For an even with , the latter says . ThereforeThe same conclusion holds for any BRST-closed insertion. Mere color-singlet invariance of an arbitrary ghost-dependent expression need not imply ; the physical-observable qualification is essential. The proof uses the invariant-measure assumptions encoded in the stated Ward identity.