Observation-time dependence of apparent compliance is the change in an inferred volume-per-pressure response when the measurement is made at different stages of filling or relaxation. For an original single passive compartment exposed to a pressure step,
The equilibrium compliance is , but a finite-time observation is smaller whenever and are positive and finite. A short observation can therefore confound stiffness with slow filling.
Two observation times identify the parameters only within the assumed model. Taking measurements at and and defining gives
For stipulated and , this model gives and s. The parameter values follow from the model as well as the data.
A second original example exposes finite-time ambiguity between stiffness and slow filling. Suppose the real response is the sum of two compartments, each with compliance 0.10, but time constants 0.2 and 2 s. Then and . Fitting the single-compartment formulas to just those two values gives s and equilibrium compliance about 0.146, although the actual equilibrium sum is 0.20. Two exact measurements can fit the wrong model exactly.
Even one perfect finite-time value supplies no finite upper bound on equilibrium compliance without further restrictions. For an observed at time , every choice can reproduce it with
Increasing compliance while increasing the filling time can preserve the measured response. Additional times, an independently bounded time scale or a validated compartment model add information.
The primary pilot study's discussion of non-uniexponential deflation and multiple time constants illustrates the experimental importance of this distinction.[ref] The constructed calculations here are pressure-step examples, not patient measurements or a replacement for the study's actual compliance definitions.