For a simple saddle point, a nearby pole coalesces with its contributing region when their separation is of order the inverse square root of the large parameter. A local quadratic phase coordinate changes the singular part to a Gaussian pole integral. Adding any residue crossed by the contour deformation gives a Faddeeva function rather than two separately singular approximations. The regular part of the transformed amplitude remains smaller by the ordinary saddle width.
The ordinary saddle-point approximation with a nearby pole loses uniformity when the pole lies within the width of the saddle's Gaussian function profile. The distinguished limit is
Use the exact quadratic phase coordinate and define
On the descending contour, runs along the real axis from to . The transformed differential has the useful partial fraction decomposition
The first term contains the nearby pole; the second is regular at the saddle and contributes . Approaching from below the descending contour means . The residue theorem then gives the Gaussian saddle-pole transition
The exponent is , as in the original PDF; the converted TeX's is a transcription error. The exact identity recovers the pole exponential in the requested expression.
The Gaussian pole integral expresses the bracket as , where is the Faddeeva function. Thus a convenient uniform leading answer is
The error estimate applies for bounded scaled pole position on the indicated side. In the overlap below the real axis, the integral contributes to leading order while the residue remains . Since , this reproduces the near-saddle limit of the separate saddle and residue terms. Boundary values on the descending contour are limits of this combined expression; the isolated real-axis pole integral itself needs a Cauchy principal value prescription.