Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 3 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The requested representation is the left coset actionIt is well defined because equal cosets remain equal after multiplication by , and . It is transitive. For it is the left regular action; for general it is the associated transitive coset representation.
Its kernel is the normal core of a subgroupIndeed, fixes every precisely when for every . Thus and . If , the image lies in the finite symmetric group , soIn particular has finite index in .
For Higman group as an amalgam of iterated HNN extensions, use the cyclic squaring presentationFirst form , an HNN extension of the infinite cyclic group . Its base embeds, so has infinite order; has infinite order as well, since the homomorphism sending is onto. Consequently and are isomorphic infinite cyclic subgroups. Adjoining the stable letter with givesWe claim is a rank-two free group. No nonzero power of belongs to : applying the map would make that power equal to , contradicting the infinite order of . Thus no nonzero power of belongs to either. Any nonempty freely reduced word in that contains is therefore a reduced HNN sequence: between inverse letters, a nonzero power cannot create a pinch. Britton's lemma makes it nonidentity. A word containing only is nonidentity by the base embedding. This proves the claim.
Likewiseis obtained from by adjoining , and its subgroup is free of rank two by the same argument. Form the amalgamated free product , identifying these two free subgroups generator by generator. Its presentation is exactly that of . The component embeddings allowed in the question show that it contains , hence is infinite. It has four group generators and four relators, so it is finitely presented.
To show that this Higman group has no nontrivial finite quotient, consider any finite image and the orders of the four generator images. A relation makes and have the same order, so every generator order is odd. Suppose one is nontrivial, and let be the smallest prime dividing any of the four orders. Choose a generator whose order is divisible by , with predecessor satisfying the displayed relation. Iterating conjugation times givesThe multiplicative order of modulo thus divides . Also and , since . Any prime divisor of is smaller than and divides the order of , contradicting minimality of . Hence every generator image is trivial, so every finite image is trivial. A proper finite-index subgroup would give a nontrivial transitive finite coset image, which is impossible. Therefore is infinite and finitely presented, with no proper finite-index subgroups.
A maximal normal subgroup is a proper normal subgroup with no normal subgroup strictly between and . To prove that finitely generated groups have maximal proper normal subgroups, fix a proper normal subgroup and order the proper normal subgroups containing by inclusion. For a chain, its union is normal and contains . It is still proper: if the union were all of , each element of a finite generating set would lie in some chain member, and the chain order would put all these finitely many group generators in one member. That member would equal , a contradiction. The Zorn lemma therefore supplies a maximal proper normal subgroup containing .
Apply this to and . By the normal-subgroup correspondence, is nontrivial and simple. It is finitely generated as a quotient of . It cannot be finite, since has no nontrivial finite quotients. Thus
The final assertion for arbitrary proper subgroups is false. Take and . If a normal subgroup contained , it would contain all conjugate transpositions, which generate , so it would equal . Hence this proper subgroup lies in no proper normal subgroup, and in particular in no maximal normal subgroup. The maximal-normal existence result requires the starting subgroup itself to be normal.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 4 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Let . The group action by left multiplication on gives a group homomorphism . Its kernel is the normal core of a subgroup,The containment follows by looking at the stabilizer of the coset , and finite index follows from the finite image in .
The Higman group isIt is visibly a finitely presented group. To prove infinitude, first formIt is the amalgamated free product of and , identifying their infinite cyclic subgroups generated by . Each factor is an HNN extension of an infinite cyclic group, so its base and stable letter both have infinite order. No nonzero power of belongs to in the first factor, by the map to sending to one and to zero. In the second factor, no nonzero power of belongs to : the stable-letter map forces a hypothetical equality to have , and the base has infinite order. The normal form theorem for an amalgamated free product therefore shows that is a rank-two free group.
Similarly,contains as a rank-two free group. Identifying these two free subgroups yieldsThe normal form theorem for an amalgamated free product embeds in . In particular, contains a free group of rank two and is infinite.
The finite quotients of cyclic squaring presentations argument now rules out every nontrivial finite quotient of . In a finite image, a relation forces the order of to be odd, since conjugate elements have the same order. If any generator has nontrivial image, let be the least prime number dividing the order of any of the four generator images, and choose whose order is divisible by . Its predecessor conjugates it to its square. If is the order of , iterating conjugation gives . Hence the multiplicative order of modulo divides . It is greater than one and divides , so it has a prime factor smaller than , which also divides . This contradicts the minimal choice of . Thus all four generator images are trivial. has no nontrivial finite quotient, and the normal-core argument above implies that has no proper finite-index subgroup.
For the final argument, Conjugation preserves the order of an element. Thus if one nonidentity element has finite order , every nonidentity element has that same order, and . Moreover is prime: if a prime factor properly divides , then is nonidentity but has the smaller order .
When , the element is nonidentity, so choose with . The conjugator is not the identity, since , and therefore . Induction gives , and at this yieldsBut Fermat's little theorem, with the odd prime , gives , contradicting that divisibility.
For , is not in the nonidentity conjugacy class, so the required conjugator cannot be chosen. Instead, a group in which every element has square one is an abelian group: also equals . In an abelian group every conjugacy class is a singleton, so one nonidentity class permits only one nonidentity element, giving a group of order two. This contradicts infinitude. Consequently the infinite group in question is a .
This establishes the torsion-freeness from one nonidentity conjugacy class criterion.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 104 6 a Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
We construct the output presentation explicitly, using HNN extensions and an amalgamated free product. Throughout, also denotes the group given by the input finite group presentation, and . Every word introduced below is a literal computable word in the displayed generators; testing whether is never part of the construction.
First fix the auxiliary Higman groupWe need two facts: is a free group of rank two, and the normal closure of is . The latter follows immediately from the relations: setting forces successively , , and , hence all three are .
Here is a normal-form verification of the first fact. The three-generator groupis an amalgamated free product of two Baumslag-Solitar groups along their infinite cyclic subgroups generated by . Their base cyclic groups embed by Britton's lemma, so this amalgamation is legitimate. Nonzero powers of in the first factor lie outside , as shown by the homomorphism recording the exponent of its stable letter . Nonzero powers of in the second factor also lie outside : the stable-letter exponent map first forces a putative equality to have , and then injectivity of the base cyclic group forces . The normal form theorem for an amalgamated free product therefore makes a rank-two free group in .
The same argument applies to , formed from the other two cyclic conjugation relations. The full is , so that rank-two free group embeds in as well. In particular has infinite order.
Now take the free productand setIntroduce letters , and define the finite presentationFinally impose the Higman relations and identifyThus the algorithm outputsThe symbols in this display are abbreviations for the explicit words above, not extra generators. Renaming the finitely many new generators to avoid makes this a uniform effective construction.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 104 6 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The auxiliary Higman group has no nontrivial finite quotients of a group. One can use this permitted property directly, but there is a short verification. In any finite quotient, let be the order of the image of . Since conjugation sends to its square, must be odd. If some , choose the least prime number dividing any . It is odd. Conjugation by the preceding generator givesThe multiplicative order of modulo is therefore a divisor of . It is greater than one and divides by the Fermat little theorem, so it has a prime divisor smaller than . That prime also divides , contradicting the choice of . Hence every and the quotient is trivial.
Given any finitely presented group , form , and apply part (a) to the word . This word is nontrivial by the normal form theorem for a free product, so the output contains by the embedding already proved.
To check its finite quotients, let be any group homomorphism to a finite group. The image of the copy of is trivial by the preceding property. The identifications make all trivial. Thus the equations give, in the image,Since , this forces for all generators of , including . The defining word then has trivial image, so as well. Every generator of has trivial image. ThereforeThis uses the concrete construction of part (a), not an assumption that arbitrary quotients preserve an embedding of .