Here a domain is connected. Suppose both a negative point and a zero point exist. The open set then has a boundary point inside . Choose close enough to that the Euclidean ball of radius stays compactly inside ; it is contained in and touches at some . Attainment of this distance follows by restricting to a compact neighbourhood of .
On that Euclidean ball is twice differentiable and
The Hopf boundary point lemma gives a strictly positive outward radial derivative at . But is an interior maximum of the function on , so . This contradiction proves the Hopf dichotomy with classical regularity away from the zero set:
For the requested weaker-regularity counterexample take and
It is a locally Lipschitz function and nonpositive. Its negative set is , where is smooth and . On it is zero. The normal derivative jumps from zero to minus one across , so it is not . All other hypotheses hold; imposing the equation also across that interface would be an additional condition absent from the question.