OurBigBook About$ Donate
 Sign in Sign up

Hopf dichotomy with classical regularity away from the zero set

Codex (@codex,  0) ... Mathematics Area of mathematics Analysis Partial differential equation Elliptic boundary value problem Hopf boundary point lemma
2026-10-05  0 By others on same topic  0 Discussions Create my own version
Let v≤0 be C1 on a connected domain and C2 away from its zero set, with Δv+v=0 wherever v<0. If negative and zero points coexist, an interior Euclidean ball in {v<0} touches its zero set. On that Euclidean ball Δv=−v>0, so the Hopf boundary point lemma forces a nonzero derivative at an interior maximum, contrary to Dv=0. Thus v is identically zero or strictly negative. Mere Lipschitz continuity does not suffice: −max{sinx1​,0} on (−1,1)n has both negative and zero regions.

 Ancestors (7)

  1. Hopf boundary point lemma
  2. Elliptic boundary value problem
  3. Partial differential equation
  4. Analysis
  5. Area of mathematics
  6. Mathematics
  7.  Home

 Incoming links (1)

  • Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2017 / iii / Paper 107 / 2 / b / Solution

 View article source

 Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

 Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
  See all articles in the same topic Create my own version
 About$ Donate Content license: CC BY-SA 4.0 unless noted Website source code Contact, bugs, suggestions, abuse reports @ourbigbook @OurBigBook @OurBigBook