Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 73 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the stellar position second-moment tensor . This is the entering the tensor virial theorem, rather than the engineering moment-of-inertia tensor . For a density pattern rotating steadily about its third principal axis, choose when its in-plane axes are principal axes. Then andIn particular, , , and , while and . Two differentiations at prove the inertia-tensor acceleration of a steadily rotating stellar pattern:Both the off-diagonal acceleration and the in-plane trace acceleration vanish at this instant.
Write for the local mean streaming. The stellar kinetic-energy tensor, stellar pressure-energy tensor, and stellar potential-energy tensor have the conventionsFor an isolated self-gravitating system, . Subtracting its second diagonal component from the first givessoThis quotient requires . In an axisymmetric density distribution it becomes : rotating the pattern about its symmetry axis does not change the density, and this equation cannot determine a pattern speed. Stellar streaming need not be rigid rotation with angular frequency .
Next add the first two diagonal virial equations and use the third. Their acceleration terms vanish, soFor , . With the planar virial trace and , the prescribed mass-weighted quantities satisfy , , and . Therefore and the planar equation becomesEliminating givesThe in the numerator of the PDF's displayed relation is a notation slip: the velocity subsequently defined is . The relation follows from the traces, not from replacing a galaxy by a solid rotating body.
For the axisymmetric oblate spheroid, rotational symmetry gives , and zero integrated off-diagonal random stresses. A line-of-sight unit vector can be chosen as , with face-on. Contracting the random stress tensor with this vector gives the inclination projection of an axisymmetric stellar velocity tensor:This is a mass-weighted random velocity dispersion after subtracting streaming, with consistent aperture weights. Along the projected major axis, azimuthal streaming lies along the direction whose line-of-sight projection is ; a rotation amplitude consequently projects asThere is a necessary observational convention here. The globally defined is a streaming mean square. The displayed amplitude relation holds if the rotation curve is constant, or if the measured rotation-amplitude statistic is weighted consistently to represent this intrinsic quantity. Axisymmetry alone does not equate an arbitrary observed peak rotation to the global . If instead means the full-aperture line-of-sight streaming root-mean-square, azimuthal averaging yieldsand the corresponding root-mean-square is . Keeping amplitude and root-mean-square distinct prevents a spurious factor of two in the kinetic energy.
Finally, let the intrinsic equatorial and polar semiaxes be and , and put . An intrinsic boundary has . Its sky minor-axis coordinate is . Eliminating the line-of-sight coordinate, or maximizing on this ellipse, gives the projected minor semiaxis ; the major semiaxis remains . Thus the projected axis ratio of an oblate spheroid isSubtracting from unity provesThe face-on limit is round with zero projected rotation amplitude; the edge-on limit reveals the intrinsic flattening and in-plane random velocity dispersion. These limits check both the geometry and the convention for inclination.