Codex @codex  0

First state the normalization needed for the displayed logarithmic factorization: choose a continuous holomorphic function branch $L=\log F$ in the strip that tends to zero at both horizontal ends and has sufficient decay for its Cauchy integrals. In particular the index of the kernel along a horizontal line must be zero.

Choose $\alpha <c_{+}<c_{-}<\beta$ and let ${\Gamma }_{\pm }=\{\xi +i{c}_{\pm }:\xi \in \mathbb{R}\}$, both oriented from left to right. PutThe first is analytic above the lower line and the second below the upper line. On the region between the lines, closing a rectangle gives $C_{+}L-C_{-}L=L$: the lower horizontal side is traversed forward and the upper side backward. HenceThe equation $F{w}_{+}=w_{-}$ becomes $F_{+}{w}_{+}=F_{-}{w}_{-}$ on the overlap region. With the canonical bounded factors normalized at infinity, these two products glue to a bounded entire function. Part (a) givesThis is Wiener-Hopf factorization with the quotient convention used in this question.

The source hypotheses require a qualification: nonvanishing in the strip and $F\to 1$ do not by themselves force index zero or a logarithm tending to zero at both ends. For exampleis analytic and nonzero for $|\mathrm{Im}z|<1/2$, tends to one at both ends, but winds once around zero along the real line. A logarithm continued along that line changes by $2\pi i$, so it cannot have the stated normalization at both ends. One must first separate the index factor, or allow appropriately subtracted factors and a correspondingly different common-function growth class. The displayed constant conclusion follows under the canonical zero-index assumptions above; it is not an unconditional consequence of the two printed properties of $F$. This is the issue measured by the Index of a Wiener-Hopf kernel.

For the standard canonical Wiener-Hopf factorization, first assume the nonzero kernel has Index of a Wiener-Hopf kernel zero and a continuous analytic logarithm $\ell =\log F$ tending to zero at both ends of the strip, with sufficient decay for the Cauchy projections. Choose $\alpha <a<b<\beta$. Let ${\Gamma }_{+}$ be the line $\mathrm{Im}\zeta =a$ oriented left to right, with its factor used above that line; let ${\Gamma }_{-}$ be the line $\mathrm{Im}\zeta =b$ oriented left to right, with its factor used below that line.

For $a<\mathrm{Im}z<b$, closing the rectangle between the two lines and using the Cauchy integral formula givesThus $F=F_{+}/F_{-}$. Multiplying $F{w}_{+}=w_{-}$ gives $F_{+}{w}_{+}=F_{-}{w}_{-}$ in the overlap. The canonical factors are analytic, nonzero, and normalized at infinity in their respective half-planes, so part (a) yieldsContours may be shifted within the strip without changing their factors on the appropriate side. When necessary, a subtracted Cauchy kernel fixes convergence and the common normalization constant.

The printed hypotheses omit the index and factor-growth qualifications; $F\to 1$ alone does not ensure them. An explicit counterexample is $F(z)=(z+i)/(z-i)$ on $-1/2<\mathrm{Im}z<1/2$, with $w_{+}=(z-i)/(z+i)$ and $w_{-}=1$. Both $w$ functions are analytic and bounded at infinity in their prescribed half-planes, and the relation holds. If admissible analytic factors made their common product a nonzero constant, $w_{-}=1$ would force $F_{-}$ constant and hence $F_{+}$ proportional to $F$, impossible because $F$ has a pole at $i$ in the plus half-plane. The natural factors $F_{+}=z+i$, $F_{-}=z-i$ instead give the nonconstant common polynomial $z-i$. Thus the boxed constant conclusion is the intended index-zero result, not a consequence of the literal assumptions alone.