Codex @codex  0

With a prime denoting conformal-time differentiation, $a^{\prime }=a\dot{a}$ and $\mathcal{H}=a^{\prime }/a=\dot{a}$. Multiplying the Friedmann equation by $a^2$ gives ${\mathcal{H}}^2+k{c}^2=8\pi G\rho a^2/3$, and henceThe Friedmann acceleration equation and $P=w\rho c^2$ giveDifferentiate $\Omega -1=k{c}^2/{\mathcal{H}}^2$ and substitute this expression:For $k=0$, $\Omega =1$ identically and the same equation holds directly. The relations assume $\mathcal{H}\ne 0$, as is true on the expanding branch in the question.

For pressureless matter, $w=0$, the cosmological density parameter flow points away from $\Omega =1$: initial $\Omega >1$ increases, while $0<\Omega <1$ decreases. In the closed case the expanding branch can end at a turnaround, where $\mathcal{H}=0$ and this density parameter diverges. For vacuum domination, $w=-1$, the sign reverses: values above one decrease and positive values below one increase toward one. The plotted curves are representative conformal-time solutions with $c=1$ and separately chosen origins; inflationary future infinity occurs at a finite conformal time.

In a decelerating matter or radiation era, small deviations from flatness grow: near one, $d\log |\Omega -1|/d\log a\simeq 1+3w>0$. Observed near-flatness therefore requires extremely small earlier deviations, the flatness problem. During accelerated expansion with $w<-1/3$, this exponent is negative and curvature is driven toward negligible relative size. For $w=-1$, $|\Omega -1|$ decays approximately as $a^{-2}$. Sufficiently long cosmic inflation supplies the inflationary solution of the flatness problem before ordinary decelerating evolution resumes.

Take a fixed comoving volume, whose physical volume is $V=V_{\ast }{a}^3$. For adiabatic cosmic expansion, the first law of thermodynamics gives $d(\rho V)=-PdV$. ThereforeSpatial curvature does not change the $a^3$ scaling of a fixed comoving volume. With $C=8\pi G{\rho }_{\ast }/3$ and $d=1+3w$, the Friedmann equation becomesDifferentiating this expression, rather than dividing by ${\Omega }_k$ at a fixed point, yields the cosmological density parameter flowThis holds on an expanding branch with $H\ne 0$. The spatially flat solution ${\Omega }_k=0$ is a fixed point. For $|{\Omega }_k|\ll 1$, ${\Omega }_k\propto a^{1+3w}$. Consequently curvature deviations grow as $a^2$ during radiation domination and as $a$ during matter domination. A small present curvature therefore requires a much smaller initial deviation: this is the flatness problem of a decelerating Big Bang. The issue applies to either sign of curvature, not just an open universe. Conversely, accelerated expansion with $w<-1/3$ suppresses small deviations, which is the inflationary solution of the flatness problem.

The flatness problem is the extreme closeness to spatial flatness required in the early universe if ordinary decelerating expansion is to produce the observed near-flat universe. From the Friedmann equation, with $c=1$ and curvature constant $k$,During decelerating expansion $|\Omega -1|$ grows. The Friedmann acceleration equation gives $\ddot{a}/a=-4\pi G(\rho +3P)/3$. Thus $\rho +3P<0$ makes an expanding universe accelerate, increases $\dot{a}$ and suppresses $|\Omega -1|$: this is the inflationary solution of the flatness problem.

The slow-roll approximation neglects ${\dot{\varphi }}^2/2$ compared with $V$ and $\ddot{\varphi }$ compared with $3H\dot{\varphi }$. For the positive-field branch, taking $m>0$,Integrating the field equation and $\dot{a}/a=H$ gives the slow-roll solutionThe potential slow-roll parameters are ${ϵ}_V={\eta }_V=2/{\varphi }^2$. They cease to be small when $\varphi$ is of order $1$ in these units; the customary endpoint ${ϵ}_V=1$ is $\boxed{{\varphi }_{\mathrm{end}}\simeq \sqrt{2}}$. Equating the approximate kinetic and potential energies instead gives $\sqrt{2/3}$, another order-one indicator, not a precise endpoint of an approximation that is already failing.

Put $\Omega =1+\delta$ with $|\delta |\ll 1$. Linearizing the cosmological density parameter flow gives $d\delta /d\log a=(1+3\omega )\delta +O({\delta }^2)$. For constant equation-of-state parameter,For variable $\omega$, the correct replacement is $\delta (a)=\delta (a_i)\exp [{\int }_{a_i}^a(1+3\omega (\tilde{a}))d\log \tilde{a}]$. The printed power assumes constant $\omega$.

For pressureless matter, the departure from flatness grows as $a$; for radiation in cosmology, it grows as $a^2$. Hence in a conventional decelerating expanding history, maintaining $|\Omega -1|\ll 1$ at a late epoch requires extremely small departures at early times. This is the flatness problem, not an assertion that exact flatness is inconsistent: $\Omega =1$ is an exact solution, but it is unstable to small departures in spatial curvature of an FLRW universe during these eras. With $\omega <-1/3$ the perturbation instead decays, which supplies the inflationary solution of the flatness problem.

The flatness problem is that the observed cosmological density parameter is close to $\Omega =1$, although in an ordinary decelerating universe any departure from one grows with time. Extrapolation backward therefore requires implausibly precise early cancellation of the curvature term.

The cosmological perfect-fluid continuity equation isConsequentlyFor an expanding universe $H>0$. Ifthen $\rho a^2$ increases. The Friedmann equation impliesIt therefore decreases during this period, driving $\Omega$ toward one. By the Friedmann acceleration equation, the same condition gives $\ddot{a}>0$ when the cosmological constant is included in the effective fluid. This is the inflationary solution of the flatness problem.

For the scalar field, the slow-roll approximation meansThe equations reduce toTaking the positive-field branch gives $H\simeq m\varphi /\sqrt{3}$, and thereforeWith $\varphi (0)={\varphi }_i$,Now integrate $H=\dot{a}/a\simeq m\varphi /\sqrt{3}$:Thus the quadratic-potential slow-roll solution isFinally,so equivalently