Integral average 2026-10-06
The integral average of an integrable function over a measurable set of finite positive measure is . Normalization removes the volume factor when comparing estimates on balls of different radii.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 9 1 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The Weak Harnack inequality is an estimate for a nonnegative weak supersolution. Write , let , and assume almost everywhere on this ball. There are and , depending only on the dimension, the uniform ellipticity bounds, , and the scaled norms of the lower-order coefficients, such thatHere is the integral average. The weak supersolution inequality uses the sign convention . For instance, the coefficient dependence can be expressed usingThus one may use the same on all sufficiently small balls when the global coefficient norms and uniform ellipticity bounds are fixed. The nonnegativity condition is essential to this formulation; a signed weak supersolution may first be shifted, with the resulting change in its forcing included. As usual, supremum and infimum statements for functions in a Sobolev space mean essential suprema and essential infima. The standard multidimensional statement uses , so . In dimension one the analogous formulation requires ; the printed restriction alone would allow , which does not suffice. To see the obstruction, smooth the nonnegative capped function by a mollifier of width . Its positive second derivative is a bump of mass and has size of order . For fixed and , this size and the minimum both tend to zero as , whereas the average on a fixed larger interval stays positive. Thus the Weak Harnack inequality cannot have the displayed uniform forcing bound in that range. Shrinking and choosing still smaller likewise defeats a uniform Hölder estimate based on that norm alone.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 9 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Write . For , choose in the annular Caccioppoli inequality to be the integral average of over . The supplied Poincare inequality on an annulus givesMoving the term to the left is the hole-filling argument:Consequently . Put and choose . For , monotonicity givesDyadic endpoints can be assigned to either adjacent interval. Since , the requested dyadic energy decay isBoth constants depend only on the dimension and uniform ellipticity bounds, not on .
There is a dimensional detail in the printed hint: an annulus is disconnected in dimension one, so that Poincare inequality with a single average is false there. The conclusion still holds. In one dimension the weak equation gives almost everywhere for a constant flux for a one-dimensional divergence-form equation . Since ,This implies the required estimate with, for example, and . If , the estimate is immediate. Thus the proof also covers dimension one without using the inapplicable hint.