Modular-size auxiliary polynomials Created 2026-10-07 Updated 2026-10-14
In the polynomial method in combinatorics, a set family of sets with common size residue modulo a prime number annihilates the displayed auxiliary functions. After multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube, functions with have degree at most . If avoids every modulo , these functions are linearly independent: evaluation at a set gives , and increasing eliminates coefficients. Combining them with diagonal intersection polynomials removes the lower-degree monomial count and strengthens the dimension bound from to .
Let be a prime number and have elements. A set family whose member sizes modulo avoid , and whose distinct pairwise intersection sizes modulo belong to , has at most members. The intersection polynomials have a diagonal, nonzero evaluation matrix on the family's characteristic vectors of sets. Multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube places these linearly independent functions in the space spanned by square-free monomials of degree at most .
Use the uniform Frankl-Wilson theorem: if is a prime number, has distinct residues, , and an -uniform set family has distinct-member intersection sizes in modulo while , then
Here is a polynomial method in combinatorics proof. For each , form the intersection polynomial
over , and use multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube so its degree is at most . At the characteristic vector of , this evaluates to zero for and is nonzero for . Consequently these evaluation functions are linearly independent.
The low-degree evaluation rank on a uniform layer bounds their space by . To justify that step without division by a possibly zero residue, form the integer incidence matrix with rows , , columns -sets , and entries . Over the rational numbers, a row with equals times the sum of the rows of all -sets containing . Thus its rational matrix rank is at most . Every larger minor is an integer determinant equal to zero and stays zero modulo , so the same upper bound holds over . This proves the theorem.
For the forbidden midpoint problem, split according to whether its members contain coordinate 1. Leave the containing half unchanged; complement every member of the avoiding half. Both resulting families consist of -sets containing 1, and complementation preserves their internal intersection sizes because
Within either transformed family, distinct intersections lie between 1 and and are not . Their residues are therefore in , whereas the set-size residue is . Apply the Frankl-Wilson theorem to each half and add:
The factor 2 comes from splitting into two families. The unsplit family can contain disjoint sets, whose intersection residue zero equals the set-size residue and prevents this direct application. Removing the shared coordinate after splitting also gives the stronger complement splitting for forbidden midpoint intersections bound .
For the construction, fix a -set and let , of size . The fixed-core construction avoiding midpoint intersections is
Two members of intersect in at least points; the same is true for two complements. An intersection across the two halves has size . No intersection is . The halves are disjoint because one contains all of and the other none, so
The uniform modular Frankl-Wilson theorem states the following. Let be prime, let have size , and let be a rank- family on , with . Assume and for every distinct . Then
The restrictions concern distinct pairs; the diagonal size residue is explicitly excluded from .
For each member , over form the intersection polynomial
At the characteristic vector , its value vanishes when and is nonzero when . Thus these functions are linearly independent on the whole rank- layer: evaluate any linear relation at each family member in turn. Replacing every positive power of by preserves all Boolean evaluations, so the functions are restrictions of multilinear polynomials of degree at most .
We need the sharp low-degree evaluation rank on a uniform layer, not the larger whole-cube dimension . Let be the integer incidence matrix with rows indexed by subsets of size at most , columns by rank- sets , and entries . Over the rationals, if , then
This coefficient counts the possible inside each containing column set and is positive because . Consequently the degree- rows span all rows over , giving rank at most . Every larger square minor is therefore the integer zero. Reducing those minors modulo shows the rank over is also at most . This transfer avoids dividing by a binomial coefficient that might vanish modulo . The independent functions lie in this row space, so their number is at most its rank. This proves the theorem in full.
For the requested forbidden-intersection application, split into sets containing coordinate one and sets avoiding it. In the first part, delete one. Distinct original sets have intersection size between one and , excluding . Their reduced intersections therefore lie between zero and , excluding , so their residues belong to . The reduced set size is , whose residue is . Frankl-Wilson on the ground set of size bounds this part by .
For the avoiding part, first complement every set. The complements contain one, retain size , and satisfy
Delete one and apply the same argument. The complement splitting for forbidden midpoint intersections yields the stronger bound
The split is essential: a family may contain complementary pairs with intersection zero, preventing direct use of on the original layer.
The Borsuk conjecture asserted that a bounded subset of of positive diameter can be partitioned into subsets of strictly smaller diameter. Here is the Kahn-Kalai counterexample to the Borsuk conjecture, implemented by balanced cut vectors. For each , define whose coordinate indexed by an unordered pair is one when exactly one endpoint lies in , and zero otherwise. Complementary sets give the same cut. Choose the representative with , obtaining exactly
distinct points: a cut determines its two parts, and fixing the side containing one removes its only ambiguity. Every cut has occupied coordinates, so all points lie in the affine hyperplane with coordinate sum . Its dimension is
We can identify this hyperplane isometrically with ; no claim of full affine span is needed.
For two side sets with , their symmetric difference has points. The two cuts disagree exactly on pairs with one endpoint in that symmetric difference, giving the balanced cut-vector distance formula
The diameter is , attained exactly when ; such pairs exist even among representatives containing one. Thus a smaller-diameter part contains no pair with side intersection . Since all representative sets already contain one, deleting that common coordinate and applying the preceding Frankl-Wilson argument bounds each part by . There is no extra factor two at this step. This is the cut construction described in the original Kahn-Kalai paper; the distance and part-size calculations above give the required justification directly.
An explicit choice is . The point set lies in dimension
The exact counts are
Their ratio requires at least smaller-diameter parts, exceeding . In particular,
Rescaling the point set to diameter one changes none of these partition counts. Therefore the Borsuk counterexample in dimension 1325 is fully explicit. This is a concrete dimension, not a claim that it is the smallest possible counterexample dimension.
The Frankl-Wilson theorem in its uniform form says: let be a prime number, let have size , and let have , while for every distinct pair of members. Then
The modular-intersection, nonuniform form of the Frankl-Wilson theorem is as follows. Let be a prime number, let have elements, and let satisfy for each , whereas for distinct . Then
This nonuniform Frankl-Wilson theorem allows different sizes and different diagonal residues; in particular it applies when all sizes have one common residue outside .
To prove it by the polynomial method in combinatorics, work over the finite field and associate to each member the intersection polynomial
Replace each positive power of in its expansion by to obtain its multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube . This preserves evaluation on every characteristic vector, whose coordinates are zero or one, and leaves degree at most . At the characteristic vector ,
It is zero for distinct , and nonzero for by the diagonal hypothesis. If , evaluating at each forces . Thus the multilinear polynomials are linearly independent. They belong to the vector space with basis the square-free monomials for , whose dimension is the displayed sum. This proves the nonuniform form, including , where distinct members are impossible and the empty product is one.
For the sharp uniform form, we need the low-degree evaluation rank on a uniform layer. Form the integer matrix whose rows are indexed by with , columns by -subsets , and entries . These are evaluations of the square-free monomials. Over the rational numbers, the row of a -subset satisfies
Indeed, when the left side counts the -subsets between and , and otherwise both sides vanish. Since , the coefficient is a positive integer. Thus the degree- rows span all the rows over the rational numbers, giving . Every square submatrix of larger size has integer determinant zero, so its determinant remains zero modulo . Hence
This reduction of matrix rank is the reason one must not try to divide by directly in .
The evaluations of the on the th uniform layer of the Boolean cube lie in the row linear span of over . They are linearly independent as functions there, because restriction to the columns corresponding to still gives the nonzero diagonal evaluation matrix. Their number is consequently at most . This completes the proof of the uniform Frankl-Wilson theorem as well.
For the odd-cardinality problem the sharper Oddtown theorem follows directly from linear algebra. Let be the characteristic vector. The parity conditions say
For any linear combination , take its dot product with . All off-diagonal terms vanish, leaving . Hence these vectors are linearly independent in an -dimensional vector space, giving
The singleton sets show that the bound can be attained. Notice why the constant term in the general nonuniform Frankl-Wilson theorem is unnecessary here: these dot products already give a diagonal evaluation matrix using only the coordinate functions.
For even , partition into the pairs and take every union of a selection of these pairs. This gives exactly distinct sets, including the empty set. Each has even size; every pairwise intersection is again a union of entire pairs and therefore has even size. This attains the proposed bound.
For any set family satisfying the even-cardinality conditions, let be the linear span of its characteristic vectors over . Now the self-dot products vanish as well as the off-diagonal ones. By bilinearity, for all , so : it is a self-orthogonal binary subspace.
For completeness the standard bilinear form on is nondegenerate, because a vector orthogonal to every coordinate vector has every coordinate zero. Thus the map from onto the dual space is surjective: every linear functional on extends to the whole vector space by extending a basis, and every such functional on is a dot product with a vector. Its kernel is . The rank-nullity theorem consequently gives . The inclusion implies . Finally, distinct members have distinct characteristic vectors, all in , and a -dimensional vector space over has exactly elements. Therefore
This proves the Eventown theorem and also explains the suggested dimension contradiction if the set family had more than members.
Work over the finite field . For each set family member form the intersection polynomial
At the characteristic vector of a set , its value is . The given restrictions make for and . Hence these functions are linearly independent: evaluate a purported relation at each set family member to eliminate its coefficient.
Use multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube, replacing every positive power of by . This preserves all evaluations on and cannot increase degree. The multilinear polynomials of degree at most have basis for . Their dimension is , and therefore
where for . The proof also covers a list whose distinct integers have repeated residues: no assumption of distinct residues is needed for this first bound.
To obtain the sharper conclusion, suppose the common size residue avoids . If , no set on this ground set can have the required residue, so the set family is empty. Otherwise, add the modular-size auxiliary polynomials
again understood as functions after multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube. They have degree at most , and all vanish on the set family's characteristic vectors of sets.
The are linearly independent. Indeed, evaluate on with :
The first factor is nonzero in the finite field. Starting with and proceeding in increasing cardinality shows for every such .
Moreover, the combined list consisting of the and the is linearly independent. Evaluation at each first kills the coefficient of ; the preceding argument then kills all remaining coefficients. Comparing this list with the dimension of the degree-at-most- space yields
This is a nonuniform common-residue version of the Frankl-Wilson theorem; exact equality of all member sizes was never used.
The exclusion of the small residues is necessary. A concrete example with is , , , the residue list , and the set family of all two-element subsets. Every member has size residue , outside that list, while distinct members intersect in zero or one element. But
Here the omitted condition fails at . Thus the example satisfies all the other hypotheses, rather than relying on a vacuous case.
The general modular form, the nonuniform Frankl-Wilson theorem, can be stated as follows. Let be a prime number, and let have elements. Suppose has for every member, while for any distinct members. Then
The uniform Frankl-Wilson theorem sharpens this to when all members have size and . Both forms require a prime modulus and exclusion of the self-intersection residue.
For the general proof, work over the finite field . Associate to each member the intersection polynomial
At the characteristic vectors of sets , this is zero if , and nonzero if . Thus these polynomials, regarded as functions on the Boolean hypercube, are linearly independent: evaluating any relation at isolates its coefficient. Apply multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube, replacing every positive power of a variable by that variable. Values on the Boolean hypercube remain unchanged, and the resulting multilinear polynomials have degree at most . Their ambient space has a monomial basis consisting of for , with dimension . This proves the general bound, including .
For completeness, obtain the uniform sharpening without dividing by factorials in a finite field. For put and . The functions with are linearly independent. Indeed, a relation gives with , so is supported only on weights in . With boundary weights , this set has a gap of at least : either consecutive allowed weights differ by , or its terminal gap does, since . The alternating sum of over any interval of free coordinates vanishes by its degree. Across that gap only one endpoint level can contribute, forcing to vanish there. Delete that level and repeat across the enlarged gap until is empty. Hence , and independence of the square-free monomials gives the claim. Adjoin these functions to the . Evaluation at each family vector eliminates the coefficients of , since vanishes there; the claim eliminates all remaining coefficients. Counting dimensions yields
The case permits at most one member directly. The gap argument is an instance of the modular layer vanishing lemma.
For the final application, enumerate the distinct sets as and let be their characteristic vectors of sets. If , the desired bound is immediate for . Otherwise , because intersects another member in points. At most one member can have size : two distinct -sets cannot have intersection size . The Gram matrix of these vectors is
For real coefficients ,
All terms are nonnegative, with . If the expression vanishes, every coefficient corresponding to a set of size greater than is zero. At most one coefficient remains, and the first term forces it to be zero as well. Thus the characteristic vectors of sets are linearly independent in , proving the constant-intersection family bound
This proof explicitly covers the possible member of size exactly ; assuming all diagonal corrections were strictly positive would miss that case. Positivity of is essential: when , the empty set and all singleton sets give members.
The Frankl-Wilson theorem. Let be a prime number, let have elements, and let . Suppose that for every , whereas for all distinct members. Then
with terms beyond understood as zero.
Work over the finite field . For each member define its intersection polynomial
Replace every positive power by to obtain a multilinear polynomial of polynomial degree at most . This Boolean multilinearization preserves its values at every characteristic vector of a set. At the characteristic vector of a set ,
It is zero if and nonzero if . Evaluating a proposed linear relation at each therefore establishes linear independence of the . The vector space of multilinear polynomials of polynomial degree at most has the basis of monomials , , of size . This proves the Frankl-Wilson theorem by the polynomial method in combinatorics. The empty product for is , and the argument still applies.
The constant-intersection family bound, directly. Write and assume . The cases are immediate. If , the nonempty members are pairwise disjoint and there can also be the empty set, giving
For , every member has size at least . If every member has size strictly greater than , form the real matrix whose rows are their characteristic vectors of sets. Its Gram matrix satisfies
For any nonzero real vector ,
Thus the rows are linearly independent and . If a member has size , it lies inside every other member. The sets , , are nonempty and pairwise disjoint, so . This also gives
These bounds are sharp: the singletons together with attain at , while all complements of singletons attain at when .
The constant t-wise intersection dichotomy. In its substantive form the last argument requires . The printed statement does not explicitly impose this. Without it the -fold condition can be vacuous and the claimed dichotomy is false: take , , , , and . There is no -tuple to test, no common -set, and , so . We therefore prove the intended assertion for and record this necessary qualification.
If , the first alternative always holds with . Suppose . Choose indices attaining the minimum intersection size , and write
For each of the remaining indices put . The hypothesis gives for distinct remaining indices. This reduces the constant t-wise intersection dichotomy to a constant-intersection family bound on the -element set . The two possibilities are treated below.
Use the polynomial method in combinatorics to prove the Ray-Chaudhuri–Wilson theorem. For each define an intersection polynomial over ,
At the characteristic vector of a set , the inner sum is . Therefore
It follows that the restrictions of to the uniform layer of the Boolean cube
have linear independence: evaluating any vanishing linear combination at each forces its th coefficient to be zero.
Apply multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube by replacing each positive power in a monomial with . This preserves evaluations on and gives multilinear polynomials of polynomial degree at most . Counting all monomials of degrees up to would give only , which is too weak. Instead use homogenisation on a uniform layer.
Because has distinct integers in , we have . For with , write , with . On ,
Indeed, at both sides vanish if ; otherwise exactly summands equal . The denominator is positive since . Thus every monomial of degree at most , restricted to , lies in the span of the degree- monomials. This vector space consequently has dimension at most . The linear independence already proved now gives
No additional condition such as is needed: only the spanning upper bound is used, not independence of all degree- monomials. The argument also covers if empty is allowed, with the empty product equal to and at most one member in the set family.