Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 21 1 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Throughout, the braces denote a multiset, so repeated splitting degrees retain their multiplicities. If the multisets agree after a common shift, permuting summands gives . Tensoring all the fibres of a vector bundle by the same line bundle leaves their one-dimensional quotient spaces unchanged. HenceThis proves one implication in the isomorphism classification of abstract rational scrolls.
For the converse first take . Every divisor class on has the form . If its square is zero, restriction to a fibre giveswhere is the hyperplane class and because . Thus . It follows that is intrinsically characterized as the primitive nonzero nef class whose square is zero. An isomorphism therefore carries to ; the sign is positive because both classes are nef and effective. The complete pencil determines the ruling, sofor an automorphism of .
On a fibre, the isomorphism preserves the positive generator of its Picard group. Consequentlyfor some integer . Push forward along the ruling, using and the projection formula for sheaves:Every automorphism of preserves each . The uniqueness of the splitting degrees in the Birkhoff–Grothendieck theorem now implies equality of the two multisets up to a shift. Replacing this by gives the sign convention in the final formula. One can see that uniqueness numerically: for a split bundle,The first difference counts the degrees with , and the second difference counts the multiplicity of . Hence these dimensions determine every splitting degree, with multiplicity.
For , subtract the smaller degree and write the normalized bundle as , . Its surface is the Hirzebruch surface . Let be its negative section and its fibre, so , , . The nef cone is generated by and : a nef divisor must have from intersection with a fibre and from intersection with , and these two inequalities also express it as a nonnegative combination of those generators. If , a class with has squarewhich vanishes only when . Thus the ruling is again intrinsic, and the same bundle argument applies. If , the surface is and has two nef square-zero rays, its two rulings. This distinguishes it from every surface. Isomorphisms may exchange its rulings, but both normalized splitting degrees are zero, so the stated classification is unchanged.
For , every scroll is , and any two single splitting degrees differ by a common shift. Thus all ranks are covered:Reading the braces as ordinary sets would lose information and make the assertion false when degrees repeat. For example, and have the same underlying set but not the same splitting multiset; their minima are both zero, so no nonzero common shift can reconcile them.