Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 64 2 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be constant and small, and write . The supplied synchronous gauge equations implyDifferentiating the first and eliminating givesFor the dominant single component, the Einstein equation gives . Therefore the exact algebraic intermediate relation isThe requested nonrelativistic density equation in synchronous gauge follows to leading nonrelativistic order: discard pressure corrections to the background, Hubble damping, and metric tensor terms while retaining , which can be comparable to gravity at the Jeans wavenumber. Since , that scale lies well inside the Hubble radius, so keeping its enhanced gradient term is consistent. The resulting equation iswhere the Friedmann equation gave . Now and , soThis is the specified approximation, not an exact finite- relativistic identity. The pressure-gradient term stabilizes short wavelengths, while gravity drives the long-wavelength Jeans instability.
Now apply the stipulated equation to with . In the pressure-negligible matter background,Thus is proportional to , exactly like the gravitational term. DefineThe comoving Jeans wavenumber and are constant in this era. The equation becomes the Euler-Cauchy equationSetting gives . For distinct real roots the full pair of modes isThese are the Jeans modes of a four-thirds polytropic cosmological fluid. The physical Jeans length isHere , so its comoving value is constant. For , and , giving genuine growth; the other solution decays. In the long-wavelength pressure-free limit, and , the familiar matter-era modes. At , the two powers are and , so the leading mode is constant rather than growing.
For both powers are negative: pressure prevents growth, although the modes still decay without oscillation. At they coincide and the complete solution isFor they become a complex-conjugate pair; a real basis isThese short-wavelength acoustic oscillations have a decaying envelope. The onset of instability is , while the threshold for oscillatory time dependence is slightly larger, ; expansion damping explains why these two thresholds are not identical.