Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 142 3 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
For the K-theory transfer of a finite covering, let be a vector bundle and defineOn an evenly covered neighborhood the sheets identify this with a direct sum of local vector bundles. On overlaps the identifications permute the sheets and apply the transition maps of , so these local descriptions glue to a vector bundle on . This operation respects direct sums, hence extends to a homomorphism of Grothendieck groupsIt obeys the projection formula for the K-theory transfer:For actual vector bundles, this follows fiberwise by distributing the tensor product of vector bundles over the direct sum; it then extends to their Grothendieck groups.
Let be the permutation vector bundle of the covering. It has rank on every connected component, but need not be a trivial vector bundle; in particular one cannot replace by multiplication by integrally. Instead writeThe componentwise nilpotence result from the preceding solution gives for some . In the localization of a ring , the finite geometric seriesis an inverse. The projection formula for the K-theory transfer givesThus implies after inverting . More explicitly, is a left inverse, proving
Projection formula for the K-theory transfer 2026-10-05
The K-theory transfer of a finite covering distributes over a pulled-back tensor product of vector bundles:For an -sheeted covering map, is the permutation vector bundle of rank . Its difference from is a nilpotent element by nilpotence of rank-zero K-theory classes, so it is a unit after inverting . Thus pullback on Topological K-theory becomes injective after this localization of a ring.