Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 101 5 i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
For a prime ideal , its height is the supremum of the lengths of strict chains of prime ideals ending at . For a proper ideal ,This is the height of an ideal.
We prove it by induction on . The case is the Krull principal ideal theorem. For the induction step, let be the finitely many minimal primes over that lie below . By induction each has height at most ; if one equals , we are done.
Otherwise, suppose has finite height and choose a chainwhose first nonminimal term is contained in none of the . Such a chain is obtained by prime avoidance and the principal ideal theorem: a three-term segment can be replaced by a prime minimal over for an element avoiding the finitely many unwanted primes. Choose
The prime is minimal over . Otherwise a prime strictly between some and would show that has height at least two, although it is minimal over the principal ideal generated by ; this contradicts the principal ideal theorem. In , the prime is therefore minimal over an ideal generated by elements, so induction bounds its height by . The strict inclusions from to giveand hence . If the height were infinite, the same argument applied to arbitrarily long finite chains would give the same fixed bound, which is impossible. This completes the proof.