An ideal is an additive subgroup of a ring that absorbs multiplication by ring elements.
For ideals in a commutative ring, the ideal quotient is . Closure under subtraction and multiplication by arbitrary ring elements proves it is an ideal. If , then : write and observe that . Consequently, if also , then is a principal ideal.
The whole ring , viewed as an ideal. Elements generate the unit ideal exactly when coefficients give .
If , expand its power . By the pigeonhole principle, each monomial contains some . Collecting terms expresses as a linear combination of these powers. This lets one use a common denominator exponent in localization arguments.
In , the ideals , and are pairwise incomparable and nonprime. Their union is the ideal : the three lines cover its two-dimensional vector space over . This shows why a primality hypothesis matters in prime avoidance.
For an ideal , its conormal module is , naturally an -module. It records generators and relations to first order along the quotient . If is the maximal ideal of a local ring, it is the cotangent space of a local ring over the residue field. For the augmentation ideal of , reduction modulo gives , with basis the classes of .
A proper ideal is irreducible if implies or . In a Noetherian ring, every irreducible ideal is a primary ideal; every proper ideal is a finite intersection of irreducible ideals.
In a Noetherian ring, an irreducible ideal is a primary ideal. In its quotient, if and , choose after the annihilators of powers of stabilize. Then , so irreducibility forces . Combined with finite decomposition into irreducible ideals, this proves the Lasker–Noether theorem.
An ideal is radical when for some positive integer implies . Over an algebraically closed field, the Hilbert Nullstellensatz identifies the vanishing ideal of with the radical .
For an ideal and an element of a commutative ring,
An ideal is nilpotent when for some positive integer .
An Oka family of ideals is a family such that and imply .
Every ideal maximal outside an Oka family is prime. If while , both and properly contain , contradicting the Oka condition.
A two-sided ideal of a noncommutative ring satisfies and .
A square-zero ideal is an ideal satisfying , so every product of two elements of vanishes.
For a unital associative algebra and prescribed -bimodule , an extension is where is unital, is unital, is a square-zero ideal, and the induced actions are the prescribed ones. Equivalences induce the identity on and . A unital linear section produces a normalized Hochschild cocycle . Conversely, on defines the extension. Changing section changes by a coboundary, giving classification by .
If , then is an abelian subgroup of the unit group. Multiplication satisfies , and , so identifies the additive group of with .
An ideal is primary when and imply for some positive integer .
The radical of a primary ideal is prime. In a number ring this forces a nonzero primary ideal to have only one prime in its unique factorization.
A minimal primary decomposition of an ideal is an irredundant finite intersection of primary ideals whose radicals are pairwise distinct.
The distinct radicals in a minimal primary decomposition are exactly the associated primes of a module , and hence are invariant. The injection into the sum of primary quotients proves one inclusion; an element supported on one component, supplied by irredundancy, proves the other. This does not imply uniqueness of embedded primary components.
A component in a minimal primary decomposition is embedded if its radical of an ideal strictly contains another radical occurring in that decomposition. Such components need not be unique. For example,
in gives different -primary ideals as embedded components, with the same isolated component .
An isolated prime of a minimal primary decomposition is a minimal member of the set of radicals of its primary components.
In a Noetherian ring, the primary component belonging to each isolated prime is uniquely determined by
Embedded primary components need not be unique.
A set generates an ideal when every element of is a finite sum of ring multiples of elements of .
A principal ideal is generated by one element: .
The product consists of finite sums of products with and .
An ideal is idempotent when . Then for every , so a nonzero idempotent ideal gives a nonzero intersection of all its powers. A semigroup algebra with arbitrarily divisible positive exponents supplies examples in a non-Noetherian integral domain. If is finitely generated, the determinant trick applied to produces such that .
The set-theoretic intersection of any family of ideals is again an ideal.
Ideals and are comaximal when .
For finitely many distinct prime ideals, one can prescribe finite valuation data simultaneously by the Chinese remainder theorem.
Reduction modulo an ideal is the quotient homomorphism .
For a two-sided ideal of a ring , the quotient has addition and multiplication induced from .
An ideal in a graded ring is homogeneous when it is generated by homogeneous elements, equivalently when every homogeneous component of each of its elements also belongs to the ideal.
The radical of an ideal is
An ideal equal to its radical is a radical ideal.
In a Noetherian ring, every radical of an ideal is an intersection of finitely many prime ideals. A maximal counterexample ideal cannot be prime. Choose with ; the strictly larger ideals and satisfy the result, and . This contradicts maximality. The unit ideal uses an empty intersection.
The nilradical of a commutative ring is its ideal of nilpotent elements, equivalently the radical of an ideal applied to its zero ideal.
In , the nilradical is generated by all . Every element uses finitely many variables and is nilpotent, while each square-free product is nonzero. Thus this nilradical is not a nilpotent ideal. A Noetherian ring cannot have this behavior: finitely many nilpotent generators give a nilpotent ideal.
For every commutative ring ,
Every nilpotent element lies in every prime ideal. If is not nilpotent, an ideal maximal among those disjoint from is a prime ideal avoiding , by the Zorn lemma and the maximality argument.

Ancestors (6)

  1. Ring
  2. Commutative algebra
  3. Algebra
  4. Area of mathematics
  5. Mathematics
  6. Home

Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.