Bernoulli polarization martingale 2026-10-25
Let , , and let be a binary random variable satisfying . Suppose is -measurable and is -measurable. The updateremains in and defines a bounded martingale. For example, take independent uniform random variables independent of the current filtration and set .
The binary identity givesand henceThe L2-bounded martingale convergence theorem gives a terminal random variable with almost sure convergence and convergence in L2. Iteration followed by the bounded convergence theorem yieldsThus takes only and , and preservation of its expected value gives a Bernoulli distribution with parameter . The terminal conditional expectation representation gives the exact mean squared errorThe finite-time paths can stay strictly inside while their limit lies entirely at the endpoints. The positive conditional variance in the interior makes permanent convergence to an interior value impossible.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 34 1 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
With the natural filtration , the sums form a martingale. Put . Independence and the characteristic function of a standard normal random variable giveIf almost surely with a finite limit, dominated convergence gives convergence of these characteristic functions to . If , that limit would be at zero and at every nonzero . A characteristic function is continuous at zero: apply dominated convergence to as . This contradiction provesThis is also sufficient by the L2-bounded martingale convergence theorem, since . Thus the almost sure convergence criterion for an independent Gaussian series is an equivalence.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 34 3 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The martingale property gives . Both and are square-integrable, so their product is integrable by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Using the -measurability of in conditional expectation givesThe pull-out step for the possibly unbounded can be justified by first truncating it, then passing to the limit in the L2 norm and using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Expanding the square now yieldsThe left side is nonnegative. Thus is nondecreasing and bounded above by , and so . For ,By symmetry of the norm difference this proves that is a Cauchy sequence in the L2 space. The completeness established in part (a) gives an withThis is the L2-bounded martingale convergence theorem, derived from martingale-difference orthogonality and completeness. The same sequence also converges almost surely by part (b), since ; uniqueness of a limit in probability identifies that limit with this .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 34 1 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
An elementary predictable process with stopping-time intervals has the form , where the stopping times are ordered and is bounded and -measurable. Deterministic endpoints give the usual simple predictable process. Define the zero-starting stochastic integral byCommon refinement and telescoping show that this definition is independent of the representation. Use for an infinite endpoint. The L2-bounded martingale convergence theorem gives convergence of in to and .
Put . The optional sampling theorem gives . For , the variable is -measurable; hence . Applying the same theorem to the assumed martingale givesConsequently the Itô isometry follows:The unbounded stopping times cause no optional-sampling gap. The terminal representation makes uniformly integrable and makes the family of stopped uniformly integrable, by conditional Jensen applied to . Also , from monotone convergence theorem and the assumed square-compensator identity. Thus has the needed uniform integrability, and truncating stopping times and passing in is legitimate. Bounded coefficients are part of the simple-integrand convention; more general coefficients require the displayed square-integrability condition.
The L2-bounded martingale convergence theorem states that a martingale with converges both almost surely and with convergence in L2 to a square-integrable random variable. Its hypotheses hold because . Thus there is almost surely with both kinds of convergence. Alternatively, the martingale convergence theorem gives the almost sure convergence, and the bound gives convergence in L2 by the dominated convergence theorem.[ref]
Probability: Theory and Examples (fifth edition) by Rick Durrett. §4.4, Theorem 4.4.6, printed p. 237: the Lp martingale convergence theorem
The calculation of the conditional expectation of the square is especially informative. The martingale property makes the cross term vanish in the square expansion, soSubtracting this from givesTaking expected values and iterating provesBy bounded convergence theorem, . The random variable inside this expected value is nonnegative, so it is zero almost surely; on this forces . Again by bounded convergence theorem, . HenceThis is the Bernoulli polarization martingale with update size . It also has an exact mean squared error: the terminal representation and the equality case for conditional second moments give