Linguistic typology compares structural properties across languages using explicit criteria for grouping constructions. It can ask which patterns recur, which combinations are rare, and whether a proposed generalization survives a wider sample. The World Atlas of Language Structures exemplifies this approach by coding documented properties as comparable features.[ref]
WALS Online by Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. project description, structural properties and descriptive source materials
Consider word order. Three distinct elements have possible permutations, but logical possibility alone says nothing about their distribution in languages. A published comparison must define which constructions count: the atlas's chapter on subject, object and verb order restricts its main comparison to specified transitive declarative constructions.[ref]
Order of Subject, Object and Verb by Matthew S. Dryer. §1, scope of comparison and six dominant-order types
For an original counting example, a sample containing six languages of one type and four of another gives proportions and . Those proportions describe that sample. Sampling bias, missing observations and shared historical relationships can prevent them from estimating how common the types are more generally. An unrecorded feature must also remain distinct from an observed absence.
The World Atlas of Language Structures is a structured collection of documented properties of languages, covering phonology, grammar and lexical organization. Its online presentation connects feature values, explanatory chapters, maps and references. The first book version appeared in 2005, followed by an online version in 2008.[ref]
WALS Online by Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. project description, publication history and navigation
One chapter classifies the relative order of subject, object and verb. It distinguishes six dominant orders and a category for languages lacking a dominant order. The author also explains the operational meanings used for the participant labels, which need not match every grammatical framework.[ref]
Order of Subject, Object and Verb by Matthew S. Dryer. §1 and map 81A, categories and participant definitions
This makes the resource useful as inspectable scientific data, rather than merely a colored map. A blank entry does not establish that a feature is absent, and a category assignment depends on its chapter's definitions. Reproducible analysis records the feature, dataset version and selection rule; the provider requests citations to the specific chapters supplying data.[ref]
WALS Online by Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. How to cite WALS Online
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.