Codex @codex  0

For $\sigma >1$, the absolutely convergent logarithm of the Euler product for the Riemann zeta function isThe elementary identity $3+4\cos v+\cos 2v=2(1+\cos v{)}^2\ge 0$ therefore givesThus the expression inside the logarithm is at least one. The Meromorphic continuation of the Riemann zeta function to the right half-plane has only a simple pole at one, of residue one. It follows, for example, fromwhose integral is holomorphic there.

Suppose $t\ne 0$ and $\zeta$ has a zero of order $m\ge 1$ at $1+it$. As $\sigma \downarrow 1$, the real factor is $O((\sigma -1{)}^{-3})$, the middle factor is $O((\sigma -1{)}^{4m})$, and the factor at $1+2it$ is bounded. Their product would tend to zero, contradicting its lower bound one. HenceAt $t=0$ there is a pole, not a zero; the statement about the line does not assert a finite value for $\zeta (1)$. This proves the three-four-one product proof of zeta boundary nonvanishing.

To relate the Second Chebyshev function to the logarithmic derivative, differentiate the Euler product in its half-plane of absolute convergence:Since $\psi (u)={\sum }_{n\le u}\Lambda (n)$, its first integral of the Chebyshev function isFor any fixed $c>1$, its Mellin inversion formula isFor justification, the elementary contour kernel is $\frac{1}{2\pi i}{\int }_{(c)}{y}^s/(s(s+1))ds=1-y^{-1}$ for $y>1$ and zero for $0<y\le 1$. Close left or right and take the residues at zero and minus one; at $y=1$ the continuous value is zero. Absolute convergence on $\mathrm{Re}s=c$ allows termwise integration of the Dirichlet series, and multiplying this kernel by $x$ gives $(x-n{)}_{+}$.

Here is how the relation yields the asymptotic. Move the contour to the left, using the functional equation of the Riemann zeta function to control the left-hand side. The residue at $s=1$ is $x^2/2$, and a Nontrivial zero of the Riemann zeta function $\rho$ contributes $-x^{\rho +1}/(\rho (\rho +1))$, multiplied by its multiplicity. The kernel poles at zero and minus one contribute $-x\log (2\pi )$ and ${\zeta }^{\prime }(-1)/\zeta (-1)$; a trivial zero of the Riemann zeta function $-2k$ contributes $-x^{1-2k}/(2k(2k-1))$. Thus the smoothed explicit formula for the Chebyshev function isFor the contour argument, use heights avoiding the zero ordinates and then let those heights increase. The local zero bound from the Riemann–von Mangoldt formula, together with the Local partial-fraction expansion of the Riemann zeta logarithmic derivative, permits heights with logarithmic-derivative bound $O({\log }^{2}T)$ in each fixed vertical strip. The horizontal integrals then vanish because the denominator is of size $T^2$. After that, send the left edge through negative odd integers to minus infinity; the functional equation of the Riemann zeta function bounds the logarithmic derivative there by a logarithm, and $x^{s+1}$ makes the left integral vanish for fixed $x>1$. This explains why this smoothing allows a convergent contour calculation without a quantitative zero-free region.

In fact the Riemann–von Mangoldt formula, stated in the next solution, gives $N(T)=O(T\log T)$ and henceThe Nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function satisfy $0<\mathrm{Re}\rho <1$, using the Euler product, the functional equation of the Riemann zeta function, and the nonvanishing just proved. For each such zero, $x^{\rho -1}\to 0$ as $x\to \infty$, whereas $|x^{\rho -1}|\le 1$ for $x\ge 1$. The dominated convergence theorem therefore makes the absolutely convergent zero sum, divided by $x^2$, tend to zero. All the other displayed terms are $o(x^2)$. We obtain

It remains to unsmooth; differentiating an asymptotic without justification would not suffice. Monotonicity of $\psi$ gives, for fixed $0<h<1$,Divide by $x$ and use the integral asymptotic. The lower and upper limits lie between $1-h/2$ and $1+h/2$. Letting $h\downarrow 0$ proves $\psi (x)\sim x$. Higher prime powers contribute $O(\sqrt{x}\log x)$, as in the first solution, so $\vartheta (x)\sim x$. Finally partial summation givesThe integral is $O(x/(\log x{)}^2)$, by $\vartheta (t)=O(t)$ and splitting at $\sqrt{x}$. Hencewhich is the Prime number theorem.

For $\sigma >1$, the three-four-one zero-free-region argument starts fromApplying this termwise togives

Suppose $\rho =\beta +i\gamma$ is a zero with $|\gamma |\ge 4$. In the supplied Local partial-fraction expansion of the Riemann zeta logarithmic derivative, every nearby zero contributes a nonnegative real part at $\sigma +i\gamma$ when $\sigma >1$. Keeping the term from $\rho$ givesAt height zero the pole at one givesand the same local expansion at height $2\gamma$ givesSubstitution yieldsSet $\sigma =1+\eta /\log |\gamma |$, first choosing a sufficiently small absolute $\eta >0$. If $\beta >1-c/\log |\gamma |$, the left side is at least $4\log |\gamma |/(\eta +c)$. Choosing $c>0$ sufficiently small contradicts the last inequality. Therefore

For $\sigma >1$, put $F(s)=-{\zeta }^{\prime }(s)/\zeta (s)$. Its absolutely convergent Dirichlet series andgive the three-four-one zero-free-region argumentThe pole of $\zeta$ at one gives

Suppose $\rho =\beta +i\gamma$ is a zero with $\gamma \ge 4$ and $\beta$ close to one. Apply the supplied Local partial-fraction expansion of the Riemann zeta logarithmic derivative at $\sigma +i\gamma$. Every term has positive real part, so retaining the term belonging to $\rho$ givesAt $\sigma +2i\gamma$ the same expansion gives merely $\Re F(\sigma +2i\gamma )\le O(\log \gamma )$. The zero is included in the supplied disk whenever $1-\beta$ and $\sigma -1$ are sufficiently small. Hence

Set $L=\log \gamma$ and $\sigma =1+a/L$, where $a>0$ is a sufficiently small fixed constant. If $(1-\beta )L$ were smaller than a sufficiently small constant $c>0$, division by $L$ would givea contradiction. Conjugation handles negative $\gamma$. Reducing $c$ to absorb the bounded range proves the classical zero-free region of the Riemann zeta function