The classical zero-free region asserts that for some ,Together with bounds for the logarithmic derivative, it permits contour arguments with exponentially small errors in .
For sufficiently large , the Riemann zeta function has no zeros in the displayed region, for a fixed positive . To derive it from the Richert bound for the Riemann zeta function, take . The logarithm of the maximum on the two discs in the Landau zero-free-region theorem is , as is . Dividing by this logarithmic factor gives the displayed width.
For and , suppose , , on radius- discs centred at and . Every zero has the displayed gap. The reciprocal Euler product bounds both centre values below by a constant times . The local logarithmic-derivative lemma gives errors , . The three-four-one zero-free-region argument then implies . For a zero close to one, choose , making the left side . Zeros farther away already satisfy the bound. Thus a logarithmic upper bound for zeta translates into a quantitative zero-free width.
The logarithm of the Euler product and give . At , upper bounds and imply the lower bound . The Cauchy estimate for derivatives gives nearby, allowing a sufficiently small leftward displacement of order . This elementary region is weaker than the classical logarithmic region but gives an explicit reciprocal bound by simple estimates.
For and , positivity ofterm by term in the Euler product givesComparing this with the pole of at one and the local poles of at zeros proves the classical zero-free region.
After shrinking the zero-free-region constant, one hasin the half-width region for large. Compare the local partial-fraction expansion at with one at a point just to the right of one, where the Euler product controls the logarithmic derivative.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.