The classical zero-free region asserts that for some ,
Together with bounds for the logarithmic derivative, it permits contour arguments with exponentially small errors in .
For sufficiently large , the Riemann zeta function has no zeros in the displayed region, for a fixed positive . To derive it from the Richert bound for the Riemann zeta function, take . The logarithm of the maximum on the two discs in the Landau zero-free-region theorem is , as is . Dividing by this logarithmic factor gives the displayed width.
For and , suppose , , on radius- discs centred at and . Every zero has the displayed gap. The reciprocal Euler product bounds both centre values below by a constant times . The local logarithmic-derivative lemma gives errors , . The three-four-one zero-free-region argument then implies . For a zero close to one, choose , making the left side . Zeros farther away already satisfy the bound. Thus a logarithmic upper bound for zeta translates into a quantitative zero-free width.
The logarithm of the Euler product and give . At , upper bounds and imply the lower bound . The Cauchy estimate for derivatives gives nearby, allowing a sufficiently small leftward displacement of order . This elementary region is weaker than the classical logarithmic region but gives an explicit reciprocal bound by simple estimates.
For and , positivity of
term by term in the Euler product gives
Comparing this with the pole of at one and the local poles of at zeros proves the classical zero-free region.
After shrinking the zero-free-region constant, one has
in the half-width region for large. Compare the local partial-fraction expansion at with one at a point just to the right of one, where the Euler product controls the logarithmic derivative.

Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.