Angular momentum ladder operator Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
The operators satisfy
They therefore change the magnetic quantum number by while preserving the total angular-momentum quantum number .
Angular momentum ladder variable Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-11-05
The coordinate combinations have eigenvalues , so their powers carry magnetic quantum numbers .
The angular momentum raising operator satisfies and . It preserves the total angular momentum while increasing the third-component magnetic quantum number by one, whenever its result is nonzero. Its adjoint operator is the angular momentum lowering operator . Expanding the product using the angular momentum commutation relations gives , hence
for simultaneous eigenvalues . For normalized this yields after fixing consistent phases. At the result is zero, the upper angular momentum ladder endpoint. For a different quantization axis, cyclically permute the components; for example raises the projection.
Anomalous Zeeman effect 2026-10-18
The anomalous Zeeman effect is Zeeman splitting whose pattern is not the simple orbital triplet. Spin and spin-orbit interaction make the upper and lower Landé g-factors differ. The same weak-field formula still applies when its assumptions hold: “anomalous” does not mean nonlinear in the magnetic field.
For example, take an electronic transition with and , neglecting hyperfine structure. With , the formula above gives and . The two allowed transitions have dimensionless shifts , while the transitions give . Thus there are four frequencies, even though each level contains only two magnetic quantum numbers. This is an independent worked deduction; it should not be substituted for the unresolved widths in the 1896 experiment.
Counting spin orbitals in an electron shell Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
Choose the one-particle states of a hydrogen atom, or a central-field description of a chemical atom, with labels
The principal quantum number identifies the electron shell. The orbital angular momentum label identifies the electron subshell; the magnetic quantum number labels independent spatial orbitals. Each has two spin one-half along an axis choices, hence spin orbitals. Applying the Pauli exclusion principle once per spin orbital gives
These quantum numbers label wavefunctions and spin projections, not electron trajectories. They need not resolve exact energy eigenstates in the presence of spin-orbit interaction; changing to coupled angular momentum eigenstates preserves the count of independent one-particle states within this shell model.
Figure 1.
Counting complete spin orbitals gives electron-shell capacities
. Original counting diagram. The left bars add electron subshell capacities ; the right panel resolves the electron shell into eighteen spin orbitals. Each small cell denotes a label choice, not a region of space. Details.
For example, allows , conventionally . Their spatial orbital counts are ; their spin orbital counts are . The sum is eighteen. The algebra behind “one per complete state” is short: two-particle antisymmetrization gives , and the zero vector cannot be a normalized quantum state. Opposite-spin electrons in the same spatial orbital have distinct complete states, so their antisymmetric product survives.
This supplies a structural link to the periodic table: finite electron subshell capacities make repeated patterns of occupied electron configurations possible. It does not predict the exact ground state electron configuration or energy of a many-electron chemical atom. Different electron subshells overlap in energy, and electron interactions change their ordering. In particular, the periodic table period lengths are not simply successive values: the third periodic table period has eight chemical elements, although the full electron shell has eighteen available states. A capacity counts available spin orbitals; an actual filling order requires a Quantum Hamiltonian.
Entropy of a finite magnetic multiplet Created 2026-10-20 Updated 2026-11-05
For magnetic quantum numbers , energies and , the partition function is . Its entropy is the title expression, a function of alone. At small , . The maximal entropy is at zero splitting. A fixed independent-spin entropy consequently fixes ; an attached heat load changes the combined isentropic path.
Linear rigid rotor Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-20
For a diatomic molecule, let be the two masses and their fixed separation. The distances from the centre of mass are and . A perpendicular axis through the centre of mass therefore has moment of inertia
The reduced mass here is not the electric dipole moment, for which we use . For a longer linear molecule, replace by , where is each distance along the axis from the centre of mass. In the point-mass idealization, the axial moment of inertia is zero; turning about that axis changes no nuclear positions, so no independent axial rotational degree of freedom is included.
For the field-free linear rigid rotor, assume a fixed internal quantum state with no electronic angular momentum or electronic spin, and omit couplings to nuclear spin. The rotational Hamiltonian is . Its orientation wavefunctions are spherical harmonics , and its angular momentum eigenstates satisfy
where and . Each belongs to angular momentum eigenstates distinguished by the magnetic quantum number , an instance of degenerate energy levels. The Planck constant is ; is the frequency-valued rotational constant. Notice that the energy eigenvalues scale as , not .
Figure 1.
Linear rigid rotor: increasing gaps between energy eigenvalues and equally spaced transition frequencies
. Original dimensionless model: . Upward arrows show photon absorption with ; the sticks show positions only, not measured or predicted intensities. The states at each energy eigenvalue are represented by one horizontal line. Details.
Subtracting consecutive energy eigenvalues gives
Thus increasing level gaps produce a regularly spaced series of lines at , with spacing . Allowed positions do not guarantee that every line is visible: electric-dipole selection rules, occupation of the initial quantum state, and instrument response also matter.
Lowest-weight coupling of two angular momenta Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-11-05
Put , with both . At magnetic quantum number , let raise only the first factor of the lowest product state and raise only the second. Applying total to the lowest product gives the normalized combination . Its orthogonal combination is annihilated by total and therefore has . This obtains a useful Clebsch-Gordan coefficients without a table.
Magnetic quantum number Created 2026-09-29 Updated 2026-11-05
The magnetic quantum number labels an eigenvalue of : , with .
Magnetic sublevel 2026-10-18
One of the angular momentum eigenstates in a multiplet, distinguished by the magnetic quantum number along a chosen axis. An applied magnetic field can split their energy levels through Zeeman splitting.
Normal Zeeman effect 2026-10-18
The normal Zeeman effect is the simple three-frequency pattern obtained in the orbital limit. Assume negligible net spin, negligible hyperfine structure and quadratic shifts, and an allowed electric-dipole interaction between levels with orbital splitting factor one. A level with has only and no first-order shift. For the other levels, gives . Define , rather than the final-minus-initial change of the emitting atom. The electric-dipole selection rule allows , hence
Many allowed transitions can share one frequency; a triplet need not mean exactly three transitions. The cleanest illustrative example is , with three upper quantum states and one unshifted lower quantum state. The component is called , and components with this stated convention. During emission the atom changes its magnetic quantum number by .
Figure 1.
Normal Zeeman triplet from three photon transitions
. Original schematic of the ideal orbital model. The upper splitting factor is one and the lower level has zero first-order shift. Downward arrows show photon emission; the spectrum uses frequency increasing to the right. Equal stick heights are schematic and do not predict observed intensities. Details.
For an original numerical example choose and a zero-field vacuum wavelength . Using and gives . The two outer components are separated by . Differentiating the vacuum relation , with the speed of light, gives
Each outer component lies about from the centre. Positive means higher frequency and shorter wavelength. Equal spacing in frequency is only approximately equal spacing in wavelength. These are calculated values for a chosen model, not historical measurements.
Circular polarization selects the sign of the absorbed photon's angular momentum along the beam. Choose that direction as and define by the absorption rule , where is the magnetic quantum number. Spontaneous emission can return an atom to a different magnetic sublevel, so absorption followed by emission is a population-transfer cycle. A sublevel that the chosen beam cannot excite is dark to that beam. Darkness is relative to the selected transition and electromagnetic polarization, rather than a claim that the atom cannot interact with any light.
A static magnetic field along defines a stable axis and gives Zeeman splitting. A transverse oscillating magnetic field can redistribute magnetic sublevel populations when its frequency matches an allowed splitting. With the appropriate optical transition, that redistribution restores photon absorption: transmitted intensity decreases, or collected fluorescence increases. These are alternative readouts whose detailed sensitivity depends on the transition, viewing direction and electromagnetic polarization.
For , setting the rate equations to zero gives the unique stationary distribution of this continuous-time Markov chain:
The nonzero mean magnetic quantum number represents atomic orientation. Increasing empties the bright state, but leaves two dark populations. For , relaxation alone gives . When and , every distribution with is stationary; the initial difference between the two dark populations survives. The equal dark populations below follow from the specified unpolarized initial condition.
Starting from , the solution for or is
For pure pumping, take in this formula. Its redistribution time is , longer than the mean scattering interval of a bright atom, because one third of scattering events return it to the same sublevel. For arbitrary initial populations the additional mode satisfies .
For an original numerical example choose and , with much larger than either. Then
At , , while . If the light is then switched off, relaxation returns all three populations toward with time constant . Faster optical preparation and slower dark recovery measure different combinations of rates.
In an optically thin uniform sample of atoms, with equal collection efficiency for each decay branch, the detected fluorescence count rate is approximately . The same scattering removes pump photons, giving when depletion is small. For the chosen example the steady scattering rate is per atom, compared with the initial . Pumping lowers this signal fivefold, while increasing transmission. If rapid mixing restores nearly uniform populations, scattering rises again. Reabsorption, strong attenuation, unequal collection efficiencies or coherent RF dynamics require a more detailed model; the reset rate does not stand for an exact RF Hamiltonian.
The nonnegative integer for which a spherical harmonic has squared orbital angular momentum . The angular part of a regular scalar wavefunction has and magnetic quantum number .
Use for a product of the two individual spin-one spin eigenstates, with magnetic quantum numbers . Total requires , leaving precisely
Here these are product labels, not labels of the total angular momentum. Write their coefficients in this order as . With physical spin ladder operators , each nonzero individual step has amplitude , so
Both must vanish for a singlet state. The independent product states therefore require . Wavefunction normalization gives the spin-one singlet state
up to an overall quantum phase. Conversely, implies through , so these conditions really select total spin zero. Distinguishability imposes no additional exchange restriction. The ladder hint uses dimensionless angular momentum units; restoring its common factor does not change the coefficient ratios.
Neglect hyperfine structure and use the electronic weak-field Zeeman splitting regime, where is small compared with the spin-orbit interaction splitting. The sodium levels are , and . The Landé g-factor formula gives
For example, inserting gives . Each sublevel with magnetic quantum number shifts by . Thus the lower level has shifts , the upper level has shifts , and the upper level has shifts and .
The electric-dipole selection rule allows except , and . Both fine structure branches are allowed. The emitted photon energy is
All the allowed components of the sodium D-line Zeeman pattern are listed below; the last column is the photon shift in units of :
These are four components of D1 and six of D2. Their strengths need not be equal; the table and arrows specify allowed transitions, not intensities.
Figure 1.
All ten electronic dipole transitions of the weak-field sodium D doublet
. Details.
The level lies above , so D2 has the larger zero-field photon energy. [ref] In the stated weak-field regime its most positive shift is . Since , the shortest wavelength is therefore produced by
The tempting pair has a larger difference of level shifts but is forbidden because .
Neglect hyperfine structure, spin-orbit coupling and the diamagnetic term, and set , . The Zeeman energy is . The electron spin is free, so every spatial result below is duplicated with an added .
For a magnetic field parallel to , the old magnetic quantum number remains good and the first-order energy levels are
The two orbitals have zero orbital angular momentum, so only their electron spin contributes at this order.
For a magnetic field parallel to , the expectation of in each individual orbital vanishes. One must still check the degenerate subspace: its projected is zero as well. Thus there is no first-order orbital splitting in a sufficiently weak transverse magnetic field. Spin still contributes .
The transverse orbital Zeeman mixing can be seen without assuming its size. Put , , and . In the real orbital basis, is unaffected while have off-diagonal matrix elements of modulus . Diagonalizing this two-dimensional Hamiltonian gives the spatial energy eigenvalues
When , their shifts relative to the earlier levels are , with added for electron spin. The displayed square-root expression also handles comparable to , provided coupling to other principal shells stays negligible. The orbital retains zero orbital correction.
These quadratic orbital estimates keep the enhanced contribution from mixing the split levels. Minimal magnetic minimal coupling also produces ; its expectation value is positive and must be added for a full order- calculation. For example it gives for . It is parametrically smaller than the mixing term when .
In atomic units the time-independent Schrödinger equation is
The displayed equation is the Radial Schrodinger equation for the hydrogen atom. Its radial derivative terms come from the Laplacian in spherical coordinates, the Coulomb term is the potential , and separation into spherical harmonics uses the orbital angular momentum eigenvalue , producing the centrifugal term .
For , substitute . Dividing the equation by and comparing powers of gives
The solution regular at the origin has , and when both equations agree. This is the circular Coulomb bound state. Thus
The radial probability measure is . With and the gamma integral, the mean radius of a circular Coulomb bound state is
At fixed principal quantum number , the allowed orbital angular momentum quantum numbers are , and each has magnetic quantum number . Hence the orbital quantum degeneracy is
Including electron spin would double this to , but spin is absent from the stated wavefunctions.
The canonical commutation relations are and . Substitution into the definitions of the creation and annihilation operators gives
The normalized ground state is defined by
Repeated use of gives the Cartesian number state of the three-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator
with energy eigenvalue
Inverting the ladder-operator definitions yields
The antisymmetry of the Levi-Civita symbol then cancels the two-creation and two-annihilation terms in , leaving the orbital angular momentum in oscillator ladder operators
Write . Then
Since the orbital angular momentum eigenvalue is , every first-excited state has
Finally,
Therefore the normalized magnetic quantum number state can be chosen as
which obeys and .