Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 ii Paper 3 30E a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
Use a Fourier transform convention for which has symbol . The distributional equation gives for real nonzero , since this smooth positive multiplier has no zeros. Consequentlywhere . This bound is independent of . For , the same multiplier defines ; alternatively approximate by Schwartz functions and pass to the limit using the estimate. This is the massive Laplacian isomorphism on Sobolev spaces.
For , the inequality , integrated against , gives the interpolation estimateFor a finite global bound in the last request, assume as well as boundedness. This assumption is necessary: the smooth bounded solution has infinite norm on . Put , . Then with norm at most . Incorporate the constant drift on the left:The constant-drift massive elliptic estimate follows because the modulus of this symbol is at least , so the same multiplier argument first establishes and then gives the stronger a priori boundIt is allowed to depend on but in fact does not need to. Once regularity has been established, the earlier estimate and interpolation also give the conventional absorption proof: , and choosing small absorbs the term.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ii Paper 4 23G Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
For , the Sobolev space consists of tempered distributions such thatFor a multi-index ,Sincewe obtain the Sobolev derivative estimateThus differentiation is bounded and linear between the stated spaces.
Taking the Fourier transform ofgivesThe only possible solution is thereforeMoreover,This proves existence, uniqueness, and bounded dependence. Conversely, maps boundedly to , sois a linear isomorphism with inverse multiplier . This is the massive Laplacian isomorphism on Sobolev spaces.
Finally, the assumed estimate and Plancherel theorem implyThus is bounded in . The functions and all their first derivatives are supported in the fixed bounded set . Their bounds give uniform translation estimatesfor and . Tight support and the Rellich-Kondrashov compactness theorem for H01, equivalently the Fourier compactness criterion, therefore provide a common subsequence for which and every first derivative converge strongly in . HenceThis is compactness from bounded support and an H2 bound.